Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 15

< June 14	June 16 >

June 15 edit

Template:Railways in Sydney edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railways in Sydney (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to Template:Railway lines in New South Wales. Gareth (talk) 22:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fiddler's Dram tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (unused) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fiddler's Dram tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No point for such a template linking to one article and that's the only article it's transcluded in. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 15:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Substitute. Category:Album track list templates are used for navigation between songs in an album. As mentioned above, the sole transclusion is a song and the only in the album with an article, and neither does the album have an article. WP:EXISTING is therefore not met. I hope the author(s) intend to create more such articles, whereupon this template can be recreated. For now, substitution will add the information into the existing infobox containing the sole transclusion. --Bsherr (talk) 17:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete, do not substitute. so many prior discussions on this subject: here, here, here, ... Frietjes (talk) 13:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. May be some consensus to merge, but the other template was not tagged. Feel free to start a new discussion if you would like to see the templates merged. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Same usage of {{2TeamBracket}} and {{Round2}}

Note:We can replace template after the discussion consensus reached. Hhkohh (talk) 13:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep, {{2TeamBracket}} has seeds, this one does not, and {{Round2}} / {{2TeamBracket}} are not compact. Frietjes (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes and Bsherr: You can vote !Merge in this TfD discussion.
Also, when type
```
{{2TeamBracket
```

| seed-width = | team-width = | score-width = | RD1= | RD1-seed1= | RD1-team1= | RD1-score1= | RD1-seed2= | RD1-team2= | RD1-score2= }}, you can see

	Finals

Hhkohh (talk) 02:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wow, so I have to explicitly seed parameters to have them not appear? that has to be the dumbest syntax I have ever seen. non-blank should be non-blank, blank should be blank, and not specified should be omitted. it's really too bad we aren't discussing {{2TeamBracket}} here, since you didn't tag that template for discussion. Frietjes (talk) 12:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frietjes: See Module:TeamBracket#No seeds and there is no action on {{2TeamBracket}}, so no need to tag on that template. Hhkohh (talk) 14:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

in that case, absolutely keep and do not merge since there are no plans to change the dumb syntax in {{2TeamBracket}}. no idea why you would do that instead of |seeds=no. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (unless as asserted below, such would contravene policy as an outcome here, in which case, Delete). Firstly, Frietjes correctly distinguishes Template:2TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds from Template:2TeamBracket.
Comparing Template:Round4, Template:Round8, etc., with Template:8TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds, Template:8TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds, etc. (curiously, Template:4TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds does not exist), the difference is that the "compact" templates leave no space between matches in the first round, making the template more vertically compact. Frietjes points this out above.
However, in a two-team "bracket", there is only one round, so it is always compact (or never compact, depending on Is the glass half empty or half full?), so there is no significant difference between the two templates that I can observe, and merging Template:2TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds with Template:Round2 would be appropriate. --Bsherr (talk) 18:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- unfortunately, this is a deletion discussion, not a merge discussion. if it were a merge discussion, two (or more) templates would be tagged with {{tfm}}. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Discussions proposing deletion often result in a consensus to merge instead. Not to put you on the spot, but you've even participated in a few of them, Frietjes. For example, Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_18#Template:Infobox_secondary_school and Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_18#Template:Infobox_rare_currency. --Bsherr (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - over 4 years ago. anything recent? Frietjes (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      - In which you participated? You'd know better than me. :-) j/k
        Two months ago? Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_11#Template:LDS-UK-States There are probably even more recent ones, but I never took the time to learn how to sort searches by date. --Bsherr (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        that probably wouldn't survive WP:DRV, but nobody objected. I am objecting here. I know it's really hard to follow procedure. but, on the positive side, it alerts anyone watching the other template that there is an ongoing discussion. Frietjes (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        I'm not aware of any policy it contravenes, and I think your view is inconsistent with WP:COMMON, but, to be safe, I'll change my position from merge to delete. It's essentially the same thing. --Bsherr (talk) 00:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Releases LJDLP edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footer Releases LJDLP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The band's navigational template consists of eight link, the band's article that was recently deleted, five of the band's album redlink articles that were never created and two albums they collabarated with the group Blood Axis. WP:NENAN, especially a band's who article was deleted. Aspects (talk) 00:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the two articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).