Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 July 29
July 29
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Only used on one page; should be substituted. Jc86035 (talk) 19:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Jc86035: This template is helpful on that one page: it significantly reduces the amount of code on it by just calling this template. Is there another reason it should be deleted? –Daybeers (talk) 22:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete after substituting. We should not be hiding article content in templates. --Whpq (talk) 00:02, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Subst then delete per nom Hhkohh (talk) 02:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- substitute and delete, no need to have a separate template. Frietjes (talk) 13:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Author approved (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Why do we use a template for a section? Think that we should subst then delete Hhkohh (talk) 10:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete after substitution. We shouldn't be putting article content into a template. -- Whpq (talk) 11:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - I apologise for this experimental idea. It will not happen again, and as creator, I have put the content back into the main article. Thank you, Iggy (Swan) 11:42, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Club folded in 2015. Add92 (talk) 10:32, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - The club has not "current squad" anymore, agreed with Add92. Iggy (Swan) 11:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no need for this Hhkohh (talk) 02:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ∯WBGconverse 07:57, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Indiatimes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template is used in the external links section. It generates a link to search results from the Times of India web site. However, per WP:ELNO point 9, we should not be adding external links to searches. Whpq (talk) 04:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 13:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).