Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 July 2

< July 1	July 3 >

July 2 edit

Template:Infobox_folk_song edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Contesting the closure of a previous discussion should go at WP:DRV, not here. ansh 666 23:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox_folk_song (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose to keep. I wonder why we define more than 16 parameters (or > 50% of their number) as "a (relatively) small number". In the existing transclusions, first of all, these separate / new parameters are used. Why don't we merge or delete {{Infobox anthem}} which has definitely fewer than 50% "disparate parameters" with {{Infobox musical composition}}? Whether ca. 50 transclusions for one month (after the creation of the first template) are "insufficient to prevent a merger" and ca. 500 transclusions for 10 years (after the creation of the second template) are sufficient? --Tamtam90 (talk) 22:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:London Buses route 488 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted. by User:Fastily Primefac (talk) 02:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:London Buses route 488 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non notable bus route per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London buses route 488. Ajf773 (talk) 19:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Janet Jackson singles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Janet Jackson singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Janet Jackson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Janet Jackson singles with Template:Janet Jackson.
No need for multiple navboxes, can happily sit on one navbox per this version. Navigation function is greater if readers only have a single navbox to look at. --wooden superman 09:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

merge per nom. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
do not merge I strongly disagree. I think there are just too much singles/songs to be included in one template. Also, the current singles template looks much tidier. Beyoncetan 2 (talk) 11:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merging far too many song articles to be kept on a general navbox with albums, videos, and tours, or other pages relating to Janet Jackson. The diff linked is actually quite overfilled and those tracks don't by any stretch "happily sit" in one navbox. It doesn't at all enhance navigation either, only makes the navbox too loaded. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is a certain point where there are too many song/singles to justify having a single template and splitting it into two makes for better navigation. The number of song links vastly outnumbers the number of other links in the combined template as stated above, so in this case I feel it makes for better navigation. Aspects (talk) 22:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

AFC Challenge Cup squad templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Philippines squad 2006 AFC Challenge Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Philippines squad 2012 AFC Challenge Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Philippines squad 2014 AFC Challenge Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:India squad 2006 AFC Challenge Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Consensus that only top international tournaments (namely, AFC Asian Cup, Euros, Gold Cup, Libertadores, Confederations Cup, and World Cup etc.) get these templates. See also July 1 TfD Hhkohh (talk) 09:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom and previous consensus. Giant Snowman 09:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. S.A. Julio (talk) 12:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Catfd2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 12. Primefac (talk) 02:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Catfd2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tfd2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Towel edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily Primefac (talk) 02:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Towel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Talk page template that has been unused (as far as I can tell) since its inception in 2012. Neither the default text nor the default file are used anywhere else on the entire project; nor are the example custom text or example custom image. ansh 666 04:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not used or needed. Frietjes (talk) 13:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).