Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 6

January 6 edit

Template:Universidade Lusíada de Angola (basketball) 2014-15 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 00:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; almost all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uruguay NFT results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 10:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; almost all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uruguayan presidential election, 2009 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 11:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

should be merged with Uruguayan_general_election,_2009#Results or deleted Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Usertalksuperwitharchives edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 15:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VFLLadderFooter edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 15:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Volley Lube team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 14. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 15:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Ballet 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 15:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates Template:WikiProject Ballet? Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiSnap Challenge edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 15:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

inactive; unlikely to be used in the future Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Years in Nicaragua edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 14. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 11:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Years in Bahrain edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 14. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 11:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Years in Chad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 14. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 11:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:La Primera División A Clausura 2008 -Group 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; appears to duplicate tables in 2008 Primera División de México Apertura Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:La Galissonnière cruisers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per author approval Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates Template:La Galissonnière class cruisers Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support The template in use is much better formatted. Semi-Lobster (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:La Liga teams map 2006-07 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates the maps in the article Frietjes (talk) 16:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sindhi Scholars edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 11:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is always debatable whom to include in such template. Such cases are better served as category rather navbox. Störm (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Has the potential to be an indiscriminate mess. Agree with nom that category is better serving for navigation. Ajf773 (talk) 09:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Content category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Merged. Unanimous consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 15:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Content category with Template:Category explanation.
{{Content category}} does the same job as {{Category explanation}}, except that {{Category explanation}} uses {{Hatnote}}, which {{Content category}} should but doesn't. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom, no need to have two templates with the same purpose. Actually, aren't they both redundant? Typing plain text "This category is for" requires no more effort than typing "Template:Category explanation" and the result does not really look much different either. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Per nom; there is little likelihood of them expanding into different purposes. - User:Axisixa [talk] [contribs] 01:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • No objection, provided that the result handles full stops and spaces at least as well as Template:Category explanation currently does. – Fayenatic London 15:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, per nomination. Bertaut (talk) 03:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).