Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 28

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 27 January 29 >

January 28 edit

Template:Anarcho-inadjectivists edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The members of this navbox have no reasonable or defined relation to each other based on the topic, and thus no need for inter-linking in this way. Some identify more as "anarchists without adjectives" than others (phrased not used at all in some of the members' articles). The members are already linked by a category, which is suitable for their loose connection. czar 17:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, the category does a better job. Frietjes (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bad Suns edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too little content ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please point me to the particular policy that mandates a minimum amount of content for a navbox? I was unable to find one and per WP:NAVBOX "Navigation templates are particularly useful for a small, well-defined group of articles" and "templates with a large number of links are not forbidden, but can appear overly busy and be hard to read and use". Thanks, Mifter Public (talk) 13:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Passing through—I've seen "three" used as the minimum, but not sure it has been codified or just standard practice czar 18:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Again, as mentioned above, what policy/substantive discussion states there is a minimum amount of links needed for a navbox? Noting that current policy states that navboxs are "particularly useful for a small, well-defined group" saying there are not enough links sounds to me somewhat like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If we want to introduce a floor on the number of links for a navbox I have no issues (nor do I if this template is deleted because of this discussion) but I believe a wider discussion would be appropriate versus piecemealing at TfD with an unwritten rule. Mifter (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, redundant navigation. the band is and albums are well-linked, and the albums are linked to each other through the album succession links in the infoboxes. Frietjes (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Frietjes. Not useful for navigation as already linked in each article. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kid Max edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spam, non-notable subject, deleted like a dozen times already. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, probably speedy delete as depending on a deleted page. Frietjes (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bellator Kickboxing Events edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, promotional template created as part of apparent spam walled garden. The "events" listed are not stand-alone articles, but links to sections of the same article. Created by Special:Contributions/JMichael22 currently indef-blocked for abusing multiple accounts. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, we don't need subnavigation between sections of the various Bellator events. Frietjes (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_28&oldid=824092868"