Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 31

December 31 edit

2018 Asian Games Squash templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates, can be easily merged into the main article. actually all templates in this category. Mohsen1248 (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Medical citation needed section edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Steel1943 (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete am a supporter of a medical citation needed template for references, but I think this is a bit excessive and obtruse, and clearly other editors feel that way as it's unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:46, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Don't need a specific template for asking medical citation. Shashank5988 (talk) 10:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Per Shashank5988. --Bsherr (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Just use {{Medical citations needed}} with the |section parameter; we don't need a separate template just for a section. Nyttend (talk) 02:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lists of monuments and memorials in Russia by federal subject (categories) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 9. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mister Philippines winners in the Male pageants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Only one link. Rzvas (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not enough links for a navbox. Ajf773 (talk) 19:03, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep not sure about navboxes in general but this has several links, including two winners, and no red links. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete not needed, per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that this navbox has 2+ links so relist this discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:London bus corridor 36 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only one of the three bus routes has an article and is the only transclusion of this template, the corridor itself is unlikely to be notable for its own article either. Ajf773 (talk) 00:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I learn something new on WP every day! Template should be deleted - used once, and I don't think it should be used outside its parent article either. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:54, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mli edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 14. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).