Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 29

August 29 edit

Template:Subzones of Bukit Batok edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TFD#REASONS 2, all the links available at and replaced by Template:Places in Singapore-- AquaDTRS (talk) 17:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marc Abraham edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox mainly about a producer fails WP:FILMNAV in the sense that Abraham is not the primary creator for any film listed here. He is often one of several producers, so to proliferate this template everywhere is to put undue weight on his contributions. He has only two directing credits, which is insufficient for a director navbox. (Three or more is what is usually appropriate.) Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not primary creator of the majority of the works in question, so WP:UNDUE applies. --woodensuperman 14:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wizarding World edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 7. Primefac (talk) 00:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kashmiri arts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear selection criteria. Misleading titles (which actually lead to biographical articles). Template is unused after I removed its only ocurrence at Literature of Kashmir. — kashmīrī TALK 07:48, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).