Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 1

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 31 August 2 >

August 1 edit

Template:BASC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and will not be used, as WP:BASC was disbanded in 2015. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Team EnVyUs current rosters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a single one of the roster members has an article here, making this navbox useless for its sole purpose of navigation. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 15:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY, meaning that if the template has been allowed to exist in the past, it shouldn't be deleted on the grounds of being "useless". I'll be populating the template with former Envyus players soon.--16:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
    • You mean, you'll be populating it with a bunch of non-notable players that I'll also very likely take to AfD? You've constantly added non-notable pages throughout your time with Wikipedia, this isn't any different. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 16:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Changed to Delete.—Prisencolin (talk) 20:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; navboxes shouldn't be used solely for decoration. Jc86035 (talk) 17:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I don't care for the template either way, but as the editor who's sporadically updated it I figured I would add my two cents.
    • As a Navbox in it's current state it's probably useless as all the "notable" players who had articles have since left the organisation. Changing the template to (notable) Former Players would make sense, however I still would err on the side of caution as from what I've seen most Category:Team_EnVyUs_players articles are original research. KuHEJx3LCb (talk) 19:29, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Delete: Following suit with what Dissident93 has laid forward and beyond-- articles fitting the esports profile as whole must be combed from top to bottom, to find and delete pages and templates that are unsubstantive. This isn't Liquipedia; this is Wikipedia, where functionality matters as much as notability. Upon combing, there will be hundreds of articles to be deleted. DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 19:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • I'd help with that. The vast majority of eSports articles here are either badly written, undersourced, and just not notable in the first place and don't belong here, and I say this as a follower and supporter of the eSports scene. I've seen multiple team and player articles that have just had their (uncited) prose directly lifted from Liquidpedia. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

TV series ratings graphs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 9. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CDM stations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use; replaced by {{adjacent stations}}, {{rail color box}}, {{station link}}, {{line link}} and {{rail color}}. The data is now at Module:Adjacent stations/Chengdu Metro. Jc86035 (talk) 09:19, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as it is no longer in use or have anymore relevance. — ASDFGH (talk?) 21:11, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SZSECI edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 9. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S&P Asia 50 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 9. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_August_1&oldid=854245327"