Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 18

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< April 17 April 19 >

April 18 edit

Template:RS500Albums edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus has dictated that the entire list of 500 albums may be a copyright violation so the attempt to do the same via a template seems to be an attempt to circumvent that. I still wouldn't be sure a NavBox is the best way to do this when, if it was allowed, a list article would be better than placing this in the articles for each album so one could navigate from #405 on the list to #498. I also noticed that many of the articles reference a different position than what the position in the navbox, so which list is being used? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. Whether or not this is a copyvio, we don't need a navbox for this. --woodensuperman 13:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I was looking at the RS500 page and noticed the RS500 401-500 template was unfinished and had a red link to RS500 301-400, so I looked in the talk page and elsewhere to see if there was a reason for this; I couldn't find one so I thought I was being helpful by finishing 401-500 and making 301-400. Clearly this was not the case, these templates seem pretty redundant anyway as the list can be found on the Rolling Stone website anyway which is linked on the page. In answer to which list was being used, it was whichever is on the Rolling Stone website, linked on the page (500 this one) for at least 301-420 (the bit I contributed). GeorgmentO (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Olympic Champions Allround Speed Skating Men edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 28. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fb team templates National teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old style, no need, should be subst or replaced by other template or style, such as using direct interlinks, Template:Fb, Module:Sports results and Module:Sports table. Previous discussions please see WT:FOOTY. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - long-standing consensus that these kind of templates are not needed. GiantSnowman 17:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all after replacing per nom and prior consensus, templates are unnecessary for simple wikilinks. S.A. Julio (talk) 16:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:United States Department of Homeland Security Leadership edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not used in any articles; not a standard for US government agencies, category will do the trick. Corky 02:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Noleak edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 28. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:No political diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too specific. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 02:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Great to point editors to useful tool, and some articles can be reasonably considered incomplete without a political diagram. Daask (talk) 21:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, useful, and not too specific. Frietjes (talk) 16:42, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Improve Olympic Sailing Article edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overspecific template. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 02:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:34, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep until a replacement is identified. Frietjes (talk) 22:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Format edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 28. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chart dates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overly-specific cleanup template. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 02:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Being specific about feedback is a virtue. --Doncram (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unused, and agree that this is overly-specific. --Izno (talk) 17:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Daask (talk) 21:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Is it being used? Clearly I saw a need for it 4 years ago, but if it hasn't been taken up or if the pages have all been sorted out, then it's had enough of a chance. Btljs (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_18&oldid=875138369"