Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 8

September 8

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 23:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

out-of-date Frietjes (talk) 21:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I agree. - Fma12 (talk) 22:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

only used in one article. connecting two articles can be accomplished by simple in-article and see-also linking. Frietjes (talk) 21:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

basically all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 20:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, Im not sure but I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • AlfaRocket, if you aren't sure, then either (a) don't comment, or (b) actually provide some useful commentary. you don't need to comment in every thread. especially when your commentary isn't helpful. Frietjes (talk) 13:20, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 September 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single use template that is easily hardcoded. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, Im not sure but I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • AlfaRocket, yet another pointless comment, are you trying to increase your edit count? Frietjes (talk) 13:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single use template that is easily hardcoded. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, Im not sure but I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single use template that is easily hardcoded. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, Im not sure but I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single use template that is easily hardcoded. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, Im not sure but I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single use template that is easily hardcoded. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, Im not sure but I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single use template that is easily hardcoded. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, Im not sure but I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single use template that is easily hardcoded. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, Im not sure but I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 September 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 September 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).