Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 29 October 31 >

October 30 edit

Template:Arj Barker edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With three articles, all fully linked to and from one another, this template does not further aid navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User Knight Of Carl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. wrong venue Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template created and only used by an indef-blocked user, rather purposeless. Home Lander (talk) 21:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Josué & Trópico Suemba edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion and one related article (NeoSon) which links to and from the main article already. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BoomBox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Useless navbox with no related articles in which to transclude it beyond the eponymous article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Doesn't look like the article is notable either. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 02:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Princesses of Hohenberg by marriage edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. See WP:SOFTDELETE. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One link, one transclusion: fails purpose of a navbox, which is to link articles. Little to no scope for expansion, as few holders of this title are notable. DrKay (talk) 19:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Private Schools in Digos City edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

navigates nothing Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Primera Andaluza edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

old and unused Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:President's Trophy Knockout Tournament edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused as there are no season articles. general history is saved in Milo President's Trophy Knockout Tournament Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Politics of South America edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, articles are using {{Americas topic|Politics of}} Frietjes (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Polish Third League 2008-09 Group West edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

old and unused Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Polibox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, politics sidebars are using {{sidebar}} instead Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Plusmarcas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, purpose is not clear Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Phocidae nav edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:Carnivora Frietjes (talk) 18:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, redundant with Carnivora navbox. Plantdrew (talk) 21:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Philadelphia Phillies season-by-season records edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates Philadelphia Phillies#Season-by-season records Frietjes (talk) 18:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Phelsuma edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and "species in genus" navboxes have been generally deprecated in favour of the lists of species in the genus articles and the genus categories. Frietjes (talk) 18:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete species in genus navboxes are a maintenance burden, and are redundant to categories and lists in genus articles. Plantdrew (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Perkinsidae edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, unclear purpose Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Star Trek New Continuity edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:StarStruck Kids edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single-use navbox (fails WP:PERFNAV) Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sports venues edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

appears to be a test page? Frietjes (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spontini operas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates navigation found in {{Gaspare Spontini}} Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Speed limits in Europe edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, articles are using {{Europe topic|Speed limits in}} instead Frietjes (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Western League teamlist edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

South Western Football League is defunct Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Asian history edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused (replaced by Template:History of South Asia) Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South African Top Eight Cup Winners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and no parent article? Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Africa topic edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and slightly confusing since the name is similar to Template:South Africa topics Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Africa squad - 2009 FIBA Africa Championship for Women edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all redlinks (squad is saved in 2009 FIBA Africa Championship for Women squads#.C2.A0South Africa .5B6.5D) Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sonic music edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all the links are redirects Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Some of them did used to be articles, but have been deleted or merged in recent years due to lack of notability. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. JOEBRO64 19:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Solomon Islands Squad 2012 FIFA Futsal World Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused (squad is saved in 2012 FIFA Futsal World Cup squads#.C2.A0Solomon Islands) Frietjes (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Central Counties of Ontario edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The grouping of places in this template serves little purpose. There is no main article for Central Counties of Ontario Tourism Region that gives any context, and the places listed here don't match the "Central Ontario" tourist region anyway. Typical case of WP:NENAN. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Nominator is entirely correct about this — this seems to be an entirely self-invented term for a region original-researched into existence by the template creator himself (an editor who has a longstanding habit of doing this kind of thing, including once hijacking the {{Greater Toronto Area}} template to create a new wider "region" that didn't correspond to any established geography of Ontario either.) Central Ontario refers to areas north and east of the GTA, not anything west of or in the GTA, while "Central Counties of Ontario" is a complete non-thing. Bearcat (talk) 21:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017 J1 League table with WD edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spam template created by user to link to his own website Fram (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - rapid fire reporting of sports results is not what WP is about. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. SarahSV (talk) 14:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete clear case of corporate-promotional intent, here and at Wikidata. The information is all tagged with references to the company. (Wikidata probably doesn't have any policy against promotional ref-spam, because Wikidata doesn't have policies on much of anything). I have submitted the usernames involved to WP:UAA as corporate promotional usernames and implied shared use. The website claims they "partner" with Wikipedia. I have sent WMF-legal a request to investigate whether this claimed-partnership violates trademark rules. Alsee (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete This template is mostly same as Template:2017 J1 League table. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017–18 Premier League table with WD edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spam template created by user to link to his own website. Fram (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Champions of Australia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful about the usefulness of this as a navigational aid. Note that we don't do navboxes like this for AFL, SANFL, WAFL premiers, etc. Only transcluded on two articles. Jenks24 (talk) 12:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per precedence regarding AFL, SANFL, WAFL premiers, etc. Flickerd (talk) 09:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-civil-qa1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User warning created by now site banned editor. Notably, it is the only one in its series - no one has seen fit to create a level 2, 3 or 4 warning. I suspect this template is rarely used and if used is more likely to escalate tensions than calm them. Indeed, the template appears to have been created by its author to make a WP:POINT (see [1]) as part of a pattern of problematic behaviour. We need to be conscious of user warning template creep, and we already have {{uw-npa1}} which (if a templated message is appropriate) seems to have broader consensus for use. The use of {{Uw-civil-qa1}} - and problems associated with it - are currently being discussed Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Joefromrandb. WJBscribe (talk) 10:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I agree with WJBscribe. This template could be considered a net-negative. It doesn't appear that the community ever bestowed upon it any authority, and the best course of action is remove it altogether. Lepricavark (talk) 21:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The sure way to inflame a CIVIL problem is to template a regular with a non-specific complaint about how the recipient is unconstructive, without any thought or engagement by the person dumping the advice. Johnuniq (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Johnuniq. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Johnuniq. -- Begoon 06:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. What-links-here shows exactly zero actual usages, and I agree that using this template is likely to escalate tensions. Alsee (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. What is needed is a personal discussion, not a template. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It has gotten some use - these are usually substed, and possibly blanked by the recipient without archiving either way. I hadn't looked at the history of this template, but obviously I should've. (Take my opinion with a grain of salt, though; if I had my way a good 90% of the standardized warning templates would go to the Great Database in the Sky.) Opabinia regalis (talk) 08:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There may possibly be a good way of wording it, even on a template, but the nature of this template is so impossibly condescending and provoking that the first step is to get rid of it . DGG ( talk ) 23:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hamline Pipers football navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 8. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_30&oldid=1136430036"