Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 25

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 24 October 26 >

October 25 edit

Template:Manchester and Milford Railway edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Carmarthen to Aberystwyth RDT. There seems to be a consensus that these two templates should be merged, but I will leave the choice of which direction that merge goes up to those who are more knowledgeable than myself (i.e. take it to the talk pages!). I said to go to {{Carmarthen to Aberystwyth RDT}} mainly due to it being the "current" line, but if it's determined the older template is better suited then go for it. Either way, the other should then be redirected. Primefac (talk) 02:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this the same line as {{Carmarthen to Aberystwyth RDT}}? Jc86035 (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(If the only difference is the branch in the top right, then a switch can be added to {{Carmarthen to Aberystwyth RDT}} to show the branch.) Jc86035 (talk) 08:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, there doesn't seem to be any clear distinction between the two templates and the stations along the route seem to use either template randomly. Perhaps User:Redrose64 could explain what's going on with these. Kaldari (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I created one of them, but not as an original - I cutpasted from an article. The two RDTs seem to relate to different historical periods (M&M old, C-A recent), but the distinction has been muddied by various people who may not have been aware of the existence of both. They could probably be merged, but it needs to be done by somebody with knowledge of the area and with the necessary editing skills. We can't merge by a straight copypaste, since the two use different incompatible methods for laying out the diagram; Template:Carmarthen to Aberystwyth RDT has been altered to the horrid {{Routemap}} syntax, and I can't find a discussion proposing that conversion - let alone consensus. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Pinging Useddenim as the user who converted the template. Nihlus 18:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd be happy to do the editing, if someone gives me clear direction as to what should be on which diagram. Useddenim (talk) 22:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  Merged. Useddenim (talk) 01:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iwerks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. the template has been substantially changed since the discussion was started Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navigates too little content. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chaouia-Ouardigha edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chaouia-Ouardigha, Doukkala-Abda, and Taza-Al Hoceima-Taounate regions are defunct after reorganization Frietjes (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015-16 Big Bash League seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:Big Bash League Frietjes (talk) 15:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015 Michigan IAC football standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and blanked Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 PLA season results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and empty Frietjes (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 Bank of the West Classic – Singles QF edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates brackets in 2016 Bank of the West Classic – Singles and 2016 BB&T Atlanta Open – Singles. Frietjes (talk) 15:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 MLB Playoffs bracket edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

these templates are unused after being merged with the articles: 2012 Major League Baseball season#Postseason, ... Frietjes (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and the parent article is a redirect to 2013 ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier, so this is probably redundant to Template:2013 ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Africa Cup of Nations qualification edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, was probably for 2013 Africa Cup of Nations qualification, but it is apparently not needed there Frietjes (talk) 14:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1990 FIFA World Cup qualification - UEFA Group 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Group 1, 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Group 2, 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Group 3, 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Group 4, 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Group 5, 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Group 6, 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Group 7 Frietjes (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1990 FIFA World Cup qualification - CONMEBOL Group 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONMEBOL)#Group 1, 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONMEBOL)#Group 2, 1990 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONMEBOL)#Group 3 Frietjes (talk) 14:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hybrid sport edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 2. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Steam Powered Giraffe edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All content on this template has been deleted or redirected Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong Delete Not only that, two of the singles listed in the box aren't even theirs. sixtynine • speak up • 12:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is a good example of a template that is not really doing anything to help navigation. Dunarc (talk) 18:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Only links two articles. --woodensuperman 15:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:At The Throne of Judgment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. per author approval Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With only one album with an article, this band doesn't need a navbox. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, created this years ago when I had a bad habit of over-creating template. Honestly thought this got deleted a few years back, pretty sure I even supported its deletion, but obviously I'm misremembering. Sock (tock talk) 06:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_25&oldid=1138373217"