Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 23

November 23 edit

Template:The Simple Life edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 04:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the entries fail WP:PERFNAV, the others are all tangential. --woodensuperman 15:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Best works edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 1. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 04:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Selena Gomez songs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 1. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 05:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Katy Perry songs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 1. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 05:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taylor Swift songs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 1. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 05:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIU Panthers quarterback navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 05:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:EXISTING... one link + one article = not enough to navigate. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest 23:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Flipsyde edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 05:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity template for a scarcely-notable band with few charting albums or singles (none in the US or UK). Current members do not have individual articles. Link to a long-departed member of the group removed. One album, one EP and single have been redirected to main band article due to lack of notability. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 02:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. Bondegezou (talk) 12:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "None in the US or UK" — It doesn't matter. This isn't American or British Wikipedia. The band was big in continental Europe. They had more charting albums and singles. --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as is. Since there is no additional navigational benefit to and from the existing articles listed in the template, there is no need for it. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 06:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017 Conference USA standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary; duplicate template of Template:2017 Conference USA football standings Joeykai (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SPEEDY. This meets WP:T3. - Mjs32193 (talk) 14:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).