Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 May 4

May 4

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it unused because it's broken, or for another reason?Fleets (talk) 14:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fleets, probably because it duplicates 2011 NRL season#Finals series and 2011 NRL season results#Finals, but with less detail. Frietjes (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct team so no need for a current roster template Spanneraol (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Team has folded. No need for current roster template. Spanneraol (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is used on one page in the mainspace that should never have been in the mainspace. It is not needed for anything. ~ GB fan 14:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is used on one page in the mainspace that should never have been in the mainspace. It is not needed for anything. ~ GB fan 14:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:STN. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ja-stalink with Template:STN.
Very similar templates, except {{STN}} is missing |2= of {{Ja-stalink}}. The latter template has no Japan-specific features. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
11:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gray Television has completed its acquisition of two stations formerly owned by Diversified Communications. The company isn't defunct, as it have other business ventures. But none of their other ventures are posted in any articles, thus needing a template at this time is useless. Csworldwide1 (talk) 11:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:RWS. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Cn-stalink with Template:RWS.
Very similar templates; {{RWS}} is just missing {{Cn-stalink}}'s |2=, which could easily be added. {{Cn-stalink}} only has 97 transclusions. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
10:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template cruft. Winners are listed at Touchdown Club of Columbus. All others of its type have already been deleted, see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 15. Lizard (talk) 03:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template cruft. Not career-defining, and not mentioned anywhere on the page it's linked to (Pittsburgh Steelers). Lizard (talk) 03:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).