Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 May 30

May 30 edit

Template:Introduction to Java edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTMANUAL. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, outside project scope. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archaeological sites in Bangladesh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anhingidae edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:Suliformes Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Algerian Satellite System edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates Template:ASAL Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aleppo Labelled Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates Template:Aleppo Governorate Districts Labelled Map which is used (could be history merged). Frietjes (talk) 13:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alberta federal electoral districts map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out-of-date after re-districting in 2015 Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Al Ittihad Pro-League Emirati Player of the Year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single-use navbox which duplicates the content already in the parent article, hence provides no new navigation. Frietjes (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unnecessary. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Abbas Mirza's Battles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates the campaign box in Abbas Mirza Frietjes (talk) 13:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1977–78 Washington Bullets vs. Opponents edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, and I didn't find any other NBA vs. Opponents templates, which is probably why this isn't being used. Frietjes (talk) 13:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is indeed the only template of this kind and it does not help in any way apart from being another unused template. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:11, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1952–53 Southeastern Conference men's basketball standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and all redirects. could be saved in userspace until the some articles are written. Frietjes (talk) 13:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    15:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:24 mechanized brigade (Ukraine) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 6. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:99 B-Line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. per author approval Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates the image-based route map being used in the article. if someone wants to supplement the image-based map with this one, then clearly it would then no longer be unused. Frietjes (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Croatia women's national basketball team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates Croatia women's national basketball team#Current roster Frietjes (talk) 19:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, not necessary. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    11:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it's used now. --Ernies73 (talk) 10:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • no it's not. Frietjes (talk) 12:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Frietjes, I put it twice on main article about Croatia women's national basketball team, but every time Oswah reverted edit with explanation "Unexplained removal of content", although I noted in summary and later on Oswah's talk page that imported template has same content as "removed" content. Please, consider that and warn Oswah. --Ernies73 (talk) 08:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Ernies73, you don't need to keep the roster in a separate template if it's only going to be used in one article. I can point you to hundreds of examples if you haven't seen this before. Frietjes (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • I'm a bad person. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • I think User:Ernies73 believes these should be kept for the same reason so many other templates have been used only on one article so that the code would be segregated from the article.Gonejackal (talk) 05:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
            • and, if someone can point to some recent TfD precedent for keeping single-use roster templates, I would be happy to reconsider. however, I can point to at least a dozen recent discussions which closed as delete for single-use roster templates. Frietjes (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yashovardhan (talk) 09:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This has nothing to do with precedent or whether it is a roster template but rather following the policy and guidelines.Gonejackal (talk) 06:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
precedent is what we use to help interpret guidelines. as for guidelines, we have item 1 of Wikipedia:TG. and precedent says that single-use roster templates violate item 1. Frietjes (talk) 15:53, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for bringing this up again, but this doesn't?Gonejackal (talk) 06:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
that's not a roster template. Frietjes (talk) 13:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Croats of Serbia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, not necessary. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    11:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it's used now on various articles. --Ernies73 (talk) 10:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yashovardhan (talk) 09:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).