Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 30

March 30 edit

Template:Georgia Lady Bulldogs basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 17:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Connecticut Huskies women's basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One link... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boston College Eagles women's basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest stable software release/Firefox 3.6 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following are linked to only one article: Template:Latest stable software release/Mozilla Firefox 2 Template:Latest stable software release/Mozilla Firefox 3 Template:Latest stable software release/Mozilla Firefox 3.5 Template:Latest stable software release/Mozilla Firefox 3.6

They can be deleted after merging.

These can be deleted straight away since nothing links to them: Template:Latest stable software release/Mozilla Firefox 1 Template:Latest stable software release/Mozilla Firefox 1.5 Mark Schierbecker (talk) 16:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prod hint edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 9. Primefac (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prod NFC use edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete.. Primefac (talk) 15:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Developed for a failed proposal, unused since. Even with File PROD coming soon, MOS:COLLAPSE advises against using collapse boxes in articles. Subst it in the proposal for the record, and delete it. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chad Stahelski and David Leitch edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The two directed a single film together, with Leitch being uncredited for it. Other than that, they don't form a regular duo as directors (they share several credits as stuntmen though). Both should get their own boxes, when they have enough films under their belt to warrant them. Don Cuan (talk) 02:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).