Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 15

June 15 edit

Template:PD-USGov-FDA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pronunciation inline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Russian Gas Centrifuge edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Audio-pipe edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hamidiyeh County edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no such thing, there is, however, Template:Ahvaz County Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Górnik Wałbrzych current roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

out-of-date and unused Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Government Departments of Uttarakhand edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:08, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no content Frietjes (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Counties of Kenya edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, and the links aren't working? in any case, the map in Counties of Kenya does a better job showing the various counties. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GenericTournament edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. test page Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"work in progress" since 2009, not touched since Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gaurav Narayanan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gateway Cities edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not a valid navigational tool Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep, has a parent article, and a sister category, so seems to be a well-defined grouping. Frietjes (talk) 13:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GMN edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Edgar181 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 19:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to have ever been used Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Administrator review edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator review is defunct, so there is no need for this template anymore. Last discussion closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Philosopher: There is no reason not to renominate immediately after a "no consensus". 23:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per reasons at last TfD. Are you planning to nominate it again and again until it's deleted or what's the plan here? Regards SoWhy 16:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @SoWhy: My plan is to renominate in hopes of getting a consensus. The last TFD closed as "no consensus", and there is nothing saying I can't speedily renominate. See WP:NPASR. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @TenPoundHammer: You might have misread WP:NPASR. It's a potential way to close a discussion with little participation, not the standard for "no consensus" closes and needs to be indicated by the closing admin. If they didn't, renominating can be seen as disruptive per the usual rules (WP:NOCON and WP:CCC). Regards SoWhy 20:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Grammy Award hosts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:France NFT results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, head article does not exist Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rrogozhinë edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete editing test Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be unused. No indication that this is a substitution template for translating from German-language WP articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox terrestrial impact site/map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject A1 Grand Prix edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:WikiProject Motorsport. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:WikiProject A1 Grand Prix and Template:WikiProject Superleague Formula with Template:WikiProject Motorsport.
Both these formerly independent Wikiprojects have been merged into being task forces of WP:WikiProject Motorsport, so the two projectbanners should be merged into WPMOTORSPORT banner as task forces (ie. "|A1-Grand-Prix=yes" and "|Superleague-Formula=yes" ) -- 65.94.169.56 (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Israel Municipality (Golan)) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Template:Infobox settlement works fine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ZVV color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VG music sound formats edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates a section of Template:Video game music Frietjes (talk) 00:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. A relic of ye olde Wikipedia—each of these articles is unsourced and should be merged/deleted. (Not to mention that it duplicates the existing navbox.) czar 05:31, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).