Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 6

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 5 July 7 >

July 6 edit

Template:US executions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, lots of sources don't look reliable in his Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tram in Algeria edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unsupported media requiring review edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused from 2010. There don't seem to be any file types we don't support Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, @TenPoundHammer: have you considered that if a media file has been reviewed and deleted then the use of the template will have been removed. So a review/transient-use template ideally will be dealt with promptly and not have ongoing use. There is a limitation of types of media that we do support. I think that keep is best here. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:W3C-valid edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 20 July 2017 (NAC). Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WP Gambia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nogales AZ Radio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge as suggested (NAC) Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Nogales AZ Radio with Template:Nogales Radio.
In 2007, this template was split from that for the stations across the Mexican border. Nogales, Arizona, just does not have enough radio stations to support its own template (Nogales, Sonora has more stations). In other border markets, which are larger and have more stations on each side, this separation makes sense, but I don't think it does here. Raymie (t • c) 18:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Family names in Andhra Pradesh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After several deletions, this navbox is down to three bluelinks. One is a redirect and another is up for deletion, so the navigational purposes of this navbox are limited. -- Tavix (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom. Template has very limited uses if any. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:U.S. Latina Calcio squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Latina Calcio went bankrupted. Despite the club may have successor club, the club must be in amateur level, thus lost its function as no sense to navigate between red linked non-notable amateur footballer at least until the successor promoted back to professional leauge. Matthew_hk tc 13:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Matthew_hk tc 15:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - defunct club, no need for a 'current squad' template. GiantSnowman 19:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - there isn't anyone currently playing for the club so what is the purpose of the "current squad" template? Inter&anthro (talk) 11:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Intermountain West Communications edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NAVBOX with just 2 links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There used to be more links here, but IWCC went about selling off its stations in the years before owner and founder Jim Rogers died of cancer. All the stations are now part of other station groups (including the one nominally owned by IWCC, whose sale has been delayed due more to FCC regulations than anything). Raymie (t • c) 18:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Sinclair has been operating those two stations for a while. And IWCC is virtually defunct, even though not officially. And at this point, they're not going to grow as it once was. So why not eliminate the template? Csworldwide1 (talk) 05:10, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_July_6&oldid=1138373585"