Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 30

< July 29	July 31 >

July 30 edit

Template:Inverurie Loco Works F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Inverurie Loco Works F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and of little potential navigational benefit. Contains only three links, of which only two are specific to the club, the other being just a link to the league they play in. Jellyman (talk) 22:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zimbabwean cricket seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:39, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zimbabwean cricket seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Little navigational benefit, as only three links. Misleading title, as it contains no articles on individual seasons. Vague inclusion criteria, as two of the linked articles cover the full history of cricket in the country chronologically, while the other covers a specific topic / period. Jellyman (talk) 22:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created this over ten years ago, probably anticipating growth, but with the fractious state of Zimbabwean cricket since then, nothing has happened and probably never will. Jack | ^{talk page} 18:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete, the articles are already well-connected, and per author approval. Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).