Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 25

July 25 edit

FIFA Club World Cup winning squad navigational boxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 110#Template:Inter Milan squad 2010 FIFA Club World Cup and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 106#Winning FIFA Club World Cup squad templates, these templates are not notable and overkill. Tournament squads are not used on the club level, only for major international football competitions (World Cup and main continental competitions). There is also a longstanding consensus to not have championship winning squad templates in football, as there are too many competitions for this to be viable. Articles already exist for all of the squads at each tournament (e.g. 2016 FIFA Club World Cup squads). S.A. Julio (talk) 23:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Kante4 (talk) 04:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination --Jaellee (talk) 06:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nomination. Matthew_hk tc 06:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom and prior consensus. I thought they'd already gone until a couple appeared on articles on my watchlist a day or two ago. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-money edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 06:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-San Marino edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't true. See c:Template:PD-San Marino. Magog the Ogre (tc) 02:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Public transport in Adelaide edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Adelaide public transport. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created template; purpose already served by Template:Adelaide public transport and Template:Adelaide Metro railway stations. Also redundant (at a lesser extent) to Template:TramsAustralia and Template:Closed Railway lines of Adelaide. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Nick and I both identified a need for a similar template, only a bit over a week apart, and it turns out neither of them is complete (as both contain links missing from the other). I support Merge {{Public transport in Adelaide}} into {{Adelaide public transport}}. This new template has not been applied anywhere yet as it was created for the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Adelaide#Trams which is an ongoing discussion about restructuring the cluster of tram articles. --Scott Davis Talk 13:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).