Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 22

July 22

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as articles have no direct relation, as per WP:NAV. Category:Multi-channel networks and List of multi-channel networks already covers this. Alizaa2 (talk) 13:57, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:37, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 31. Primefac (talk) 00:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to 31 JulyPrimefac (talk) 00:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HS tournaments and awards are usually non-notable and not shown in articles. Babymiss fortune 05:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to 31 JulyPrimefac (talk) 00:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HS tournaments and awards are usually non-notable and not shown in articles. Babymissfortune 05:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to 31 JulyPrimefac (talk) 00:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HS tournaments and awards are usually non-notable and not shown in articles. Babymissfortune 05:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to 31 JulyPrimefac (talk) 00:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HS tournaments and awards are usually non-notable and not shown in articles. Babymissfortune 05:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to 31 JulyPrimefac (talk) 00:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HS tournaments and awards are usually non-notable and not shown in articles. Babymissfortune 05:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to 31 JulyPrimefac (talk) 00:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HS tournaments and awards are usually non-notable and not shown in articles. Babymissfortune 05:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:05, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to {{disputedtag}}. KMF (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Disputed tag. Primefac (talk) 00:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to {{disputedtag}}. KMF (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:48, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

now merged with the article, so it's no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, almost all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 14:46, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

only used in one article, mostly unlinked plain text Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. This is left over from the 2000s, when an attempt to navbox Canadian parliamentarians by province or territory went nowhere due to an inability to agree on the template design -- however, they're now navboxed by political party, with the result that all of the provincial templates were deprecated and deleted years ago. For some reason I can't quite suss out, however, this doesn't seem to have been deleted with them, but has just lingered unused. (And if you want proof of how unused it is, the MPs line hasn't been correct for two full elections now.) Bearcat (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to Template:Samantha Bee Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only two useful links. Host should not be included per WP:PERFNAV and the "related" shows are tangential at best. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: a WP:3O is open about this template's content (which could potentially have, and in some revisions does have, more links) and about the template's relationship to the Samantha Bee article, and the relationship of both to Category:Full Frontal with Samantha Bee. Comments on this TfD might be best deferred until after the 3O is completed, hopefully today. I'm awaiting responses from the two disputators (or whatever real word belongs there) that the questions to address are correctly identified.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  20:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done [1]. I ended up needing to do both 1) a nearly top-to-bottom analysis of wording problems (conflicts, inconsistencies, confusions, unintended consequences, and likely intent) in WP:PERFCAT, WP:PERFNAV, and WP:FILMNAV; and 2) a cat.-by-cat., article-by-article review of the de facto consensus on how to handle talk/variety shows and presenters who are integrally associated in the public mind with certain of them. I hope this will be used to improve the guidelines' wording and help prevent many future flamey editwars like the one that preceded this TfD and the 3O.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  11:08, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Template is utterly essential for navigation. As mentioned in the note above me - the template had several links, which the user requesting to delete this template removed without reaching consensus. For comparison, please see Template:Last Week Tonight. TonyIsTheWoman (talk) 04:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, but make it a combined bio/show navbox. This should be done the same way as Template:Howard Stern Show. It's an exactly parallel case, will prevent any attempt to create two infoboxes, and will make the protracted, multi-page edit-war over this template, category, and articles evaporate as moot.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  11:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a good idea. To make it a {{Samantha Bee}} template would address my concerns, and allow for inclusion of The Detour (TV series) which she also created, making it a much more useful navbox. Thanks also for your lengthy WP:3O consideration. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename Change it from "Full Frontal with Samantha Bee" to simply "Samantha Bee" - you would lose no content, but open the possibility to include much more information fairly quickly. -Gohst (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).