Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 17

< February 16	February 18 >

February 17 edit

Template:RocheLexicon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 February 28. Primefac (talk) 00:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RocheLexicon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Full Metal Jousting edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 February 28. Primefac (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Full Metal Jousting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Project edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 February 28. Primefac (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Project (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brothers Osborne edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was ~~delete~~ keep. Speedy close, withdrawn. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brothers Osborne (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, WP:TOOSOON. Too few links to warrant an article at the moment; "Good at Tonight" is a redirect. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Template now has six links. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Writing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 17:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Writing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

duplicates other "under construction" templates Frietjes (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).