Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 12

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 11 February 13 >

February 12 edit

Template:DPRK supreme leaders hymns edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Redlinks have been removed. NPASR if non-redlink reasons are given for this template's deletion. Primefac (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quite ... impressive, the spontaneous love of North Koreans for their noble leaders, to manifest itself in that many patriotic hymns. But I think that a navbox consisting of mostly red links is not very useful. This topic is better covered as a list article, if there are sources for all of these titles.  Sandstein  23:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. If the navbox only consisted of the seven links that are currently blue, I doubt that you would have nominated it. We can just pare it down to them; a single section will suffice. Nyttend (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and remove redlinks. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Performance art edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 6 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

People's Choice Awards templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 6 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox fighter biography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a template Peter Rehse (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:University of Waterloo Stratford Campus edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

redundant, unused template Aloneinthewild (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Utoronto Mississauga edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

redundant, only contains two links Aloneinthewild (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, just use standard in-article linking. Frietjes (talk) 00:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unnecessary - as per Frietjes. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MiNP Records edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No navigation provided; consists entirely of red links. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ecuafutbol player edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Created 4 years ago but unused. current links to that website return HTTP 404. GZWDer (talk) 09:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Probably nobody would complain if we G8-speedied it, because it's dependent on a non-existent or deleted page. Nyttend (talk) 00:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parkways in Westchester County, New York edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better suited by a category. Also see past Valdosta precedent, since confirmed here, here, here, and here, here, and here, and here. Rschen7754 00:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_February_12&oldid=1138373794"