Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 30

< August 29	August 31 >

August 30 edit

Template:BMAart edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BMAart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

mostly redlinks, not a good topic for a navbox Frietjes (talk) 20:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~unused, I find it not good and not important for wikipedia.~~ I find it good and important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 13:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
AlfaRocket, seriously, you shouldn't say a template is "unused" if it's being used. I am beginning to think that all of your comments should be ignored in these discussions. Frietjes (talk) 13:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes: I already attempted to communicate with the editor at his talk page. This editor appears not to speak in English natively and I would guess the editor is young, based on the pattern. Either way, you might feel free to nudge him some more at his talk page, and failing improvement, might be worth walking over to ANI. --Izno (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Frietjes. --Izno (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KR Puram Assembly edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KR Puram Assembly (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, duplicates template:KR Puram Assembly Labelled Map Frietjes (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, out-of-date, and duplicates navigation found in Template:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Frietjes (talk) 17:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Template:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom should be used instead. --mwilso24 (^Talk/_Contrib) 18:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jaipur Atrauli Gharana Lineage Tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jaipur Atrauli Gharana Lineage Tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Janggi diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Janggi diagram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Joan of Arc graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joan of Arc graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Italian chess grandmasters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Italian chess grandmasters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, better to use a category Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in Ireland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template refers to a single incident, with it being unlikely that more incidents will occur to make the template necessary. The incident is already linked in the 1981 list. GR _{(Contact me) (See my edits)} 17:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add tfd tags to all pages you nominate for deletion. (I did it for you in this case) Ppp ery 22:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand because there are actually several other aviation accidents that fall within the template. Let me see if I can find a list from Ronny Vogt's Irish Crash Airmails which list at least 11. Alcock and Brown's flight was possibly the first such incident and Pan Am Flight 1-10 is another that I have added, just for a start. ww2censor (talk) 11:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aviation accidents and incidents in Ireland may have some others... ----wooden superman 12:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Woodensuperman, I've seen those and now there are 13 entries, though a few are redlinks. ww2censor (talk) 13:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Against the Current edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Against the Current (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two related links - the album and the tour supporting the album, which both already link to and from one another. EP article was redirected and the band is not know for any of the singles and this template would never be placed on the articles for those songs. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:24 Hour Service Station edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:24 Hour Service Station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Does not perform any useful navigational function. --wooden superman 15:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 15:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- AlfaRocket, your cut-and-paste comments are not helpful. you clearly didn't check "what links here". Frietjes (talk) 21:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rugbyleaguebox collapsible/season edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 16:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rugbyleaguebox collapsible/season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seems to be used a bare handful of times but does not obviously seem to do anything another template in the related series does not.

"It hasn't caught on" might be another way to phrase it. Izno (talk) 13:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. J Mo 101 (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Seems to be a good way of displaying information. Is there a way to see how little this has caught on before a potential deletion?Fleets (talk) 08:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Fleets: Yes, Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Rugbyleaguebox collapsible/season has a transclusion count (contrast Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Rugbyleaguebox collapsible). Not great numbers either way, actually; I have replied to Frietjes below on this last point. --Izno (talk) 15:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the standard is {{rugbyleaguebox collapsible}}. if we need "round" information, we can add it to {{rugbyleaguebox collapsible}}. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes: As it happens, "the standard" has only 42 transclusions itself. Are we sure that's any more necessary, and whether that should be merged to Template:Rugbyleaguebox (450-some-odd transclusions) (especially given WP:MOSCOLLAPSE)? --Izno (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
sure, we could probably replace {{rugbyleaguebox collapsible}} as well, but that would be a follow up discussion. Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- AlfaRocket, your cut-and-paste comments are not helpful. you clearly didn't check "what links here". Frietjes (talk) 21:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Frietjes you make the same!. AlfaRocket (talk) 13:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - AlfaRocket, so why are you just adding the same comment to every discussion? Do you know what "unused" means? Frietjes (talk) 13:45, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete, nom makes a strong argument and there are other alternatives that can do the same role. Mattlore (talk) 20:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cannabis in Arizona edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cannabis in Arizona (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links to warrant a navigation template The Banner talk 10:01, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 15:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- AlfaRocket, your cut-and-paste comments are not helpful. you clearly didn't check "what links here". Frietjes (talk) 21:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Db-welcome edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Db-welcome (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless db- template, because not only is it not an actual CSD criterion, it's hardly even a welcome message. Twinkle has "problematic user" welcomes as well as auto-notification when CSD tags are placed, so this half-manual half-welcoming template seems unnecessary. Primefac (talk) 03:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, plus naming things Template:Db-foo that aren't actual speedy deletion tags confuses the edit filter meant to track tag removals. 04:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 15:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
unused , I find it not important for wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 18:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Misleading. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 15:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).