Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 10

< August 9	August 11 >

August 10 edit

Template:Viva Blue edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 August 24. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Viva Blue (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MLR line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure) f e minist 06:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MLR line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Gareth (talk) 03:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete not important--AlfaRocket (talk) 18:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South West Rail Link edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f e minist 06:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South West Rail Link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused template, the line has been integrated with T2 Gareth (talk) 03:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete!--AlfaRocket (talk) 18:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FrontlineSeasonNavigation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f e minist 06:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FrontlineSeasonNavigation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused table in template form. There is already a table in use at List of Frontline episodes that is the same as this template. Aspects (talk) 01:30, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kris Angelica edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f e minist 07:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kris Angelica (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Does not aid navigation as there are only 2 articles and they both easily link to and from each other without this Navbox. WP:NENAN. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the two articles are well-connected without the navbox. Frietjes (talk) 14:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).