Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 September 8

< September 7	September 9 >

September 8 edit

Template:Internetquelle edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nom after making subst-only (non-admin closure) Ppp ery 15:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Internetquelle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

German-language wrapper of {{Cite web}}. Should be made Subst:-only, if kept. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a widely used internet link template which is very useful when translating articles from German Wikipedia because it automatically displays the link. Deleting it would mean editors faffing about trying to individually copy every parameter of every link into "Cite Web". Agree it should be "subst"ed. That is normal practice with these sorts of templates. --Bermicourt (talk) 21:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and make it subst-only. I think there are some limits on substing inside of ref tags, however, so a bot might need to do the work. The other "Citation translation" templates listed under "See also" in the documentation should be treated the same way. I've had my eye on all of these for a while. Thanks for making this proposal. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question what is the process for making a template "subst only"? Which bot carries out such substitutions already? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:01, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pigsonthewing: I think AnomieBOT does it if you add {{Subst only|auto=yes}} to a template's documentation page. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 13:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - See {{Subst only}} and Category:Wikipedia templates to be automatically substituted for clues. I don't know exactly how it all works. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:46, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - The latter is fairly clear, and confirms Jc86035's suggestion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've marked this template for substitution, as suggested above. If that's not reverted, and if the bot does its job, I'll be happy to withdraw the nomination. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pigsonthewing: You'll need to add it to User:AnomieBOT/TemplateSubster force for the bot to work on it, since it currently has over 100 transclusions. (see note here) Anomie ⚔ 23:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the bot has done its job and there are now no transclusions of the template in article space, so I'm happy to withdraw the nomination for deletion. For info, it turns out to be necessary to mark up templates for safe substitution before summoning the bot. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite RAMP edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:23, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite RAMP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:RAMP release (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:RAMP release PD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite Quran/Print edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite Quran/Print (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite DOI: 10.1126/science.1215182 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per prior consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite DOI: 10.1126/science.1215182 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use. AIUI, such templates are deprecated. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:34, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete after substing. See Deprecation of Cite doi templates (Sep 2015). – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite Monumentenregister/URL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 September 20. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite Monumentenregister/URL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Russian city district edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 20 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Russian city district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox british artist edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete, test edit. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:30, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox british artist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one draft Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 10:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to {{Infobox artist}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox dog edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy to User:Haykam821/Infobox dog. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox dog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one user's sandbox Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 10:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Move (back?) to User:Haykam821/Infobox dog, without leaving a redirect behind, as it seems to be a draft of sorts and it's only a year since it was created so too soon for MfD. Uanfala (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).