Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 October 9

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 8 October 10 >

October 9 edit

Template:HD/shout edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 07:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-prose help desk template that does not attempt to answer the question being asked and is not mentioned on {{HD/doc}} Pppery 19:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HD/cite edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 07:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk template not listed at {{HD/doc}} and probably referring to a bug that has been fixed in the four years since this template's creation. Pppery 19:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ulisses F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 07:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Club dissolved, no current squad. "In February 2016, Ulisses were expelled from the league after their licence was revoked due to both financial and non-financial shortcomings." Source: 2015–16 Armenian Premier League Kq-hit (talk) 19:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HD/chromeblue edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 07:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk template for a chrome bug fixed in 2012 (when PrimeHunter added the text saying it was fixed in the latest version) Pppery 19:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There are no posts about the Chrome bug since 2012 so the template is not needed. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 13:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marianne Maier W65 World Record edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 07:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marillion lineups edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 07:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates table in main article. Frietjes (talk) 17:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marine SAR statistics start edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 07:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:08, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb team Boca Juniors edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 18 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:43, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HD/GKG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 18 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:43, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hd no sig edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 07:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to the much clearer {{unsigned}} and/or {{HD/s}}. Pppery 14:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. redundant indeed. --SuperJew (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb team Itesalat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 15:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Useless. There's already a template for this club (Template:Fb team Telecom Egypt). A delete or a redirect to the other template could work. Ben5218 (talk) 12:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect so as not to break tables. --SuperJew (talk) 15:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A.C. Rimini 1912 squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 15:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no notable players. Club was refounded as Rimini Football Club 1912 in summer 2016 after financial problems and currently plays in 5th tier of Italian football. Kq-hit (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Team competing in 5th tier with barely a chance to get enough notable players for the template to be useful for navigation. --SuperJew (talk) 15:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused fb team templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. There is consensus to delete any Fb templates with zero transclusions as per the below and the numerous previous discussions along these lines linked below. ~ Rob13Talk 07:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Useless. There's already a template for this club (Template:Fb team Al Mokawloon). Ben5218 (talk) 10:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Complete list
note, I did not use {{tfd links}} since it exceeded the page size limits. Frietjes (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all, If these template are unused it might very well be because Frietjes is removing their usage, as they did here. "Unused" is not the correct rationale. If you want to have a real discussion about it open a real discussion with a valid reason. --SuperJew (talk) 15:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
that template is no longer on the list. the initial list was generated by the database report, and I am removing those have since been transcluded. Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mate you must be joking. It was only "not transcluded" because you removed the transclusion on the page --SuperJew (talk) 16:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
and I have since removed it from the list above, the list was generated from Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates/13 and Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates/14. any which have been subsequently transcluded are being removed from the list above. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - whether they are unused or not, there is clear consensus that there is no need for these kind of templates. Subst and delete. GiantSnowman 17:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all - "No need for these kind of templates" - And yet, they're still being utilised until someone comes along and mass changes them all? - J man708 (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
J man708, are you saying that someone has been mass changing all of them? the list above was generated from a database report of unused templates from July 2016. so any mass removal must have been before that date. and I am removing any that have been subsequently put to use, or if someone explicitly asks for one to be removed from the list [1]. Frietjes (talk) 13:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@J man708: they can be WP:SUBST and deleted. See this discussion and this discussion and this discussion. GiantSnowman 17:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
CommentCertainly some were still used. The nominator claimed it was generated from unused template database, seems it is false. Matthew_hk tc 12:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:Matthew hk, the list was generated from Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates/13 and Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates/14. any which have been subsequently transcluded are being removed from the list above. please provide one example which does not appear in Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates/13 and Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates/14 or retract your accusation. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - there were previous consensus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_81#FB_team_templates) on replacing the usage of those fb templates, but most of them weren't deleted cause they still needed to be replaced and that would take a really long time to replace their usage. I spent a lot of time replacing them around few years ago but I still haven't been able to keep doing it. (Please note that the User:Gno-simple-edits is my account for doing these repetitive edits) GNozaki (talk) 13:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the template for Oldham Borough. I created this template when the club announced its change of name. The club then folded before it ever competed with its new name, and hence the new template became redundant. Drawoh46 (talk) 15:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pageprotection edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 15:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blank template Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a user top icon template that is used on user pages and produces a padlock icon in the top right corner with the tooltip "This user helps out with requests for page protection.". Iazyges, would you reconsider your nomination? Uanfala (talk) 08:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Uanfala What is your proposal Do you mean to nominate this template for deletion? What do you mean by "Iazyges, would you reconsider your nomination?" Debresser (talk) 09:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • The nomination was made by Iazyges and their rationale was that the template is blank. But the template turns out not to be blank, so I was wondering if the nominator wouldn't consider withdrawing. I'm not suggesting that they should or should not withdraw – I don't have an opinion on this template's usefulness. Uanfala (talk) 09:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had a look at it and it seems to be unused, after a few years of existence, and was created by a now blocked user. Though functional it would seem to be unnecessary and created for no good reason, redundant given all the other ways to ask for help with page protection and protected pages. So delete.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused and not needed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, unused and not likely to be used. Frietjes (talk) 13:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Republic of China (1949–71) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 15:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused: created as the country data for Republic of China (1949–71) but that is now a redirect after a discussion. Per that discussion the country did not exist as a separate entity for this period so there is no need for this. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 00:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_9&oldid=1138532645"