Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 October 21

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 20 October 22 >

October 21 edit

Template:Infobox All-Africca Games event edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hard-coded infobox. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox AFC championship game edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to {{Infobox NFL game}}. Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Felix Chong and Alan Mak edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary wrapper for two navboxes. Frietjes (talk) 22:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cork NHL Team 1972 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sepahanmainkit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Senecio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

incomplete and would be very large if it were complete, duplicates List of Senecio species. Frietjes (talk) 17:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Plantdrew (talk) 01:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator; all templates purporting to list the species of a genus should be deleted. They have few uses; they are less likely to be maintained; they cannot include a reference, but need one. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semi Finals edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Secondary Schools edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sidebar Entertainment industry in Puerto Rico edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 29 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused NYCS Platform Layout templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. Frietjes (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete pretty sure that there is precedent for deletion, in that similar templates have been deleted before, after discussion - maybe WP:CSD#G4 applies? --Redrose64 (talk) 09:58, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

golfers_who_have_won_2_or_more_Major_Championships_in_one_year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These two navboxes are simply a repetition of existing articles (Men's major golf championships#Multiple major victories in a calendar year, Women's major golf championships#Multiple major victories in a calendar year) and as such seem, to me, to be useless. Does every list of golfers who have achieved some feat require a corresponding template, surely not. Both authors of these templates are currently inactive. Nigej (talk) 09:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnecessary trivia navboxes. Tewapack (talk) 16:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RMpmc/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The parent template was redirected to Template:RMnac per an earlier TfD, which makes the documentation subpage orphaned and useless. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Years in Ukraine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to the standard category structure. for navigating between the articles, we have {{Year in Ukraine}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_21&oldid=1143743079"