Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 6

< November 5	November 7 >

November 6 edit

Template:F.C. Grosseto S.S.D. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:F.C. Grosseto S.S.D. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Outdated and incomplete. Club plays in Serie D and has currently only five notable players, see F.C. Grosseto S.S.D.#Current squad Kq-hit (talk) 22:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:San Marino Calcio squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Marino Calcio squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated. Club plays in Serie D and has only three notable players, see San Marino Calcio#Current squad Kq-hit (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sorrento Calcio squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sorrento Calcio squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template unused and outdated. Club plays in Serie D and has very few notable players. The main article Sorrento Calcio does not include a current squad. Kq-hit (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S.S. Virtus Lanciano 1924 squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S.S. Virtus Lanciano 1924 squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No current squad. "The club was excluded altogether from the Italian football league pyramid, and is currently only active as a youth sector." (Source: S.S. Virtus Lanciano 1924) Kq-hit (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Topic (Africa) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Topic (Africa) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Topic (Asia) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Topic (Europe) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Topic (Oceania) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Topic (North America) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Topic (South America) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Topic (Americas) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Topic (Africa), Template:Topic (Asia), Template:Topic (Europe), Template:Topic (Oceania), Template:Topic (North America), Template:Topic (South America) and Template:Topic (Americas).
Very poorly used and can be replaced by {{Africa topic}} series with proper parameters. 2001:DA8:201:3512:618D:98CB:D5D6:2906 (talk) 17:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep, as far as I can tell there is no replacement which adds the country as a trailing parenthetical. Frietjes (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:World topic edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:World topic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:World topic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Can be replaced by continent-based templates. The list of countries is not grouped in any way which makes navigation difficult.
The inclusion criteria is too arbitrary which includes Taiwan but not Palestine or Kosovo or Western Sahara etc.

2001:DA8:201:3512:618D:98CB:D5D6:2906 (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – What exactly is proposed? Deletion? Merging? Replacing? Adding content? It's widely used, including in other templates. Countries are listed alphabetically; grouping (how?) would not make it easier for navigation. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:20, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep, widely used. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep, easy to use & also widely used. 14GTR (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This template is used in dozens (or perhaps hundreds) of articles, and it cannot be easily replaced if it is deleted. Jarble (talk) 18:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Hindu temple edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge, however feel free to explore rewriting the Hindu template infobxo as a wrapper as suggested. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Hindu temple (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox religious building (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox Hindu temple with Template:Infobox religious building.
I have raised it earlier, raising it again. The template is a mere copy of the resulting template. There are very little or no new parameters. Why keep a separate template? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 15:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

merge, seems sensible. Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Frietjes: is it a mere copy? I see a lot of specifics that are not same. @Capankajsmilyo: if you raised it earlier, please link the last discussion. What is new that is causing you to challenge the last consensus? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I never said it was a mere copy, but merging the two seems sensible. last time I checked, a Hindu temple is a religious building. Frietjes (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

oppose, the two templates look different, and the customization and widespread use of Hindu temple template makes this re-request unconvincing. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
oppose, I don't agree that Template:Infobox Hindu temple is mere copy of Template:Infobox religious building. Hindu temples have distinct features which are not found in other religious buildings. Ex. Primary Diety, Temple Tank,Temple Poets, important_festivals, Direction_posture etc. Being used Template:Infobox Hindu temple in 4-5 articles i would say it would not make sense to use Template:Infobox religious building for Hindu temples. CodePanda
Rewrite {{Infobox Hindu temple}} as a wrapper of {{Infobox religious building}} with a child infobox, if needed. That reduces maintenance costs without forcing a merge, and it gives us a better idea of whether a full merge at a later time is a good idea. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-US-record edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-US-record (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template which may not accurately represent Wikipedia copyright policy. It has been altered by an IP-hopping individual with a problematic editing history. Edgeweyes (talk) 14:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It gives useful information about sound recordings and copyright law. 108.71.123.212 (talk) 12:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Entirely unused, unlikely to be used, and a borderline misrepresentation of policy. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete, we don't need it. Frietjes (talk) 01:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Defiance season one episode list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 14 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Defiance season one episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Monk season 8 episode list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Monk season 8 episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Monk season 5 episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

mostly redirects and duplicates navigation found in Template:Monk (TV series), and in the infobox succession links, and in the main season articles Frietjes (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Monk season 2 episode list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Monk season 2 episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Monk season 3 episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Monk season 4 episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Monk season 6 episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Monk season 7 episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not used in any articles and mostly redirects Frietjes (talk) 13:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ouija edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ouija (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

we really dont need an infobox for a film series of 2. the book is a redirect. we really dont need this even if and when a third is produced, as the links to the other 2 will be all over each article. this is best for larger franchises and notable ancillary articles, like "Ouija toys" (can you imagine, making a TOY for KIDS out of a horror franchise? Yuck) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, appears to only link 2 articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).