Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 May 10

< May 9	May 11 >

May 10 edit

Template:And list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to {{enum}}. The concerns of the single keep vote are addressed by redirection rather than deletion. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 21:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:And list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template that duplicates functionality of {{Enum}}. As such hardly used; I count only one actual use, to print an error in {{London Gazette}}, which can be replaced with {{enum}} or reworked. Previously deleted for similar reasons. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 14:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Why use obscure computer programmers jargon? Especially when it's arguably a poor use of the term.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

to me it’s short for "enumerate". But if you find the name inadequate and have a better name then creating a redirect makes sense. If you find the name really objectionable then a move, with an RM if it is contentious, is appropriate. There is no need to create, or keep, a duplicate.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 15:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to {{enum}}. Folks can still use {{And list}} if they want. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:09, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The House of Tudor's and Glyndŵr's family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 21:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The House of Tudor's and Glyndŵr's family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. And unreferenced since 2015. Magioladitis (talk) 13:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Darwin-Wedgwood-Galton family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 21:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Darwin-Wedgwood-Galton family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Magioladitis (talk) 13:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Metz family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 21:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Metz family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. And unreferenced since 2015. Magioladitis (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nguyễn Lords family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 21:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nguyễn Lords family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single transclusion. If we really need family tree we shold just copy te content in the article. Magioladitis (talk) 12:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Winslow family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 21:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Winslow family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unreferenced since 2015. Magioladitis (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brasseur family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 20:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brasseur family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single transclusion. I suggest that we subistitute and delete. Magioladitis (talk) 11:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Falcon 1 launch history edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 20:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Falcon 1 launch history (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Full contents merged today to Falcon 1 along with List of Falcon 1 launches which was this template's only use. — JFG ^talk 05:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, delete. The contents are much more appropriate in the article namespace. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).