Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 7

June 7 edit

Template:Nagorno-Karabakh Republic-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 04:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect stub template format; also, category has been deleted per cfd. Her Pegship (talk) 17:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, though I don't know what to replace it with... —PC-XT+ 22:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Story of Thor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 04:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navigates between only 2 articles and is unlikely to see expansion at any near or far future date. Izno (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, standard in-article wikilinking works fine for connecting these two articles. Frietjes (talk) 20:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Safoora edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unnecessary sidebar (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only four links. Some of these are likely non-notable, and I'll be evaluating them for potential AfD nominations. Either way, clearly not worth a sidebar. ~ RobTalk 05:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete or rewrite as a footer navigation box. Frietjes (talk) 20:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Internet-Archive-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The corresponding stub category was deleted after this discussion, so the template should go as well. Currently unused. In the interests of full disclosure, I removed the single transclusion already as part of implementing the close of the linked discussion above. That transclusion was at Internet Archive's Children's Library. ~ RobTalk 04:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).