Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 13

June 13 edit

Template:PD-banknote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{PD currency}} FASTILY 10:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roman/2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

0 transclusions. Functionality has been completely superceded by Template:Roman. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 06:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Motorola microcontrollers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge, why not? If there is a problem feel free to let me know and I can reopen this discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Motorola microcontrollers with Template:Motorola processors.
One template can handle all the stuff currently divided between the two templates; and there already seems to be some overlap. Template talk:Motorola microcontrollers also suggest merging. DavidCary (talk) 02:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 02:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CC-by-3.0-Works edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no transclusions, redundant to {{Cc-by-3.0}} FASTILY 00:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Publication officielle edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file license template, and likely based on an incorrect interpretation of copyright. See also: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Publication officielle FASTILY 00:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-status edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{Non-free fair use}}, and overly complicated/difficult to use FASTILY 00:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-script edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused/no transclusions, redundant to {{PD-simple}} FASTILY 00:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).