Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 July 12

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 11 July 13 >

July 12 edit

Template:PD-software edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 04:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (no transclusions) license template, does not exist on Commons, applies to uncommon and very specific cases which could easily be covered by {{PD-because}} FASTILY 23:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-font-USonly edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 04:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (no transclusions) license template, redundant to {{PD-ineligible}} FASTILY 23:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ian Stewart Medal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable single game award that only existed for a few years. Fails WP:NAVBOX criterion #4. Jenks24 (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Template:Ian Stewart Medal is now appended to the (existing) associated article at Ian Stewart Medallist. Citations within that article are weak, but awarded 2004~2015 and appears active. Template appears to be similarly appended to the article of each recipient.
Keep Per above. UW Dawgs (talk) 23:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ian Stewart Medallist should not be a page and should be redirected to List of individual match awards in the Australian Football League per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Dyer–Lou Richards Trophy, note that Ian Stewart Medal was AfD during that nomination and the result was a redirect, Ian Stewart Medallist was created quite recently and does not meet notability to warrant its own page, therefore, this nomination for Template:Ian Stewart Medal does meet WP:NAVBOX #4. Flickerd (talk) 12:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete now that the article has been redirected per WP:NAVBOX #4 —PC-XT+ 07:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Western Athletic Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 22:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A standings template should be used and many of these are redirects to the main athletics article, which would mean this template does not navigate. Corkythehornetfan 05:42, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Nom. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not enough soccer-specific article links to justify a soccer navbox. ~ Rob13Talk 04:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Western Athletic Conference men's soccer seasons navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If and when the included articles are written I see no reason why it can't be recreated/refunded. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 22:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One link... Corkythehornetfan 05:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when more links turn blue —PC-XT+ 05:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Summit League women's basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. While it's true that 11/18 links are valid (though most are redirects), the main subject of the navbox (the coaches) have only 2/9 being valid. Should the other coaches get articles REFUND would certainly apply. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No articles created... this template doesn't navigate... Corkythehornetfan 05:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@UW Dawgs: There is no point in keeping navboxes that do not navigate... which is the purpose of [nav]box. Per WP:REDNOT, this navbox is excessive... Red links may be used on navigation templates with links to existing articles, but they cannot be excessive. Editors who add excessive red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or they may be removed from the template. So either someone needs to start working on these or they should be deleted... (at least four links per navbox – not including the title.) Per WP:EXISTING (which is what I go off of and is similar to REDNOT), Red links should normally be avoided unless they are very likely to be developed into articles. (I don't see this happening anytime soon). Corkythehornetfan 17:59, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
10 of 18 are valid links. You're welcome to delink the others per WP:EXISTING, though this has nothing to do with the WP:GNG topics or deleting the template itself. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:EXISTING does not say to delink it... in fact, it says "Unlinked text should be avoided." (bullet #2)... Corkythehornetfan 20:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when about half of the coach names (preferably all) turn blue (we count links to pages where the template is transcluded; others are more informational, less navigational, as you can only follow the navbox one way) —PC-XT+ 05:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pac-12 Conference tennis venue navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links... Corkythehornetfan 05:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when at least half of the venue links (preferably all) turn blue —PC-XT+ 05:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pac-12 Conference wrestling navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links... Corkythehornetfan 05:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when at least half of the names (preferably all) turn blue —PC-XT+ 05:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pac-12 Conference men's soccer seasons navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to July 21. Primefac (talk) 02:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015 Pac-12 men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nom. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 Pac-12 men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nom. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Pac-12 men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nom. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 Pac-12 men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nom. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015 Mid-American Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Nom. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 Mid-American Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Nom. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference athletic director navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. While there are plenty of links, they are to the universities not to the ADs, and the ADs are the focus of the navbox. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links... Corkythehornetfan 05:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two are linked... per WP:EXISTING, Unlinked text should be avoided. Corkythehornetfan 18:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Acutually, no redlinks in this one, so strike. 15 of 26 topics are article links with the unlinked being WP:GNG topics. This conference template is consistent with our consensus seen in 11 templates at Category:NCAA Division I athletic director by conference navigational boxes. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
All but two (this one and Western Athletic Conference) have four or more links, which is acceptable and actually navigates the box. Navboxes with fewer than four links are useless and do not navigate. Corkythehornetfan 20:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when at least half of the director names (preferably all) turn blue (pages the navbox will be transcluded on) —PC-XT+ 05:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:NAVBOX. Quoting NAVBOX, we use navboxes to "facilitate navigation between ... articles". We can't do that when the articles don't exist. ~ Rob13Talk 04:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 Colonial Athletic Association men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Nom. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 Big Ten Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Big Ten Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 Big Ten Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Big South Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One link... Corkythehornetfan 05:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 Big South Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One link... Corkythehornetfan 05:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Big East Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 Big East Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links and a standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015 Atlantic Coast Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 Atlantic Coast Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A standings template should be used, not a navbox. Corkythehornetfan 05:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlantic 10 Conference marching bands navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links not enough to navigate... Corkythehornetfan 05:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when about half of the band names (preferably all) turn blue —PC-XT+ 07:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015 Atlantic 10 Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Standings template should be used, not navbox. We don't do these for other sports, we shouldn't do it for soccer. Corkythehornetfan 05:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 Atlantic 10 Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A standings template should be used, not a navbox. We don't do this for other sports, we shouldn't do this for soccer. Corkythehornetfan 05:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Atlantic 10 Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links not enough to navigate + the standings template should be used, not a navbox... Corkythehornetfan 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 Atlantic 10 Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three links and the standings template should be used, not a navbox... Corkythehornetfan 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlantic 10 Conference Baseball Player of the Year navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to July 21. Primefac (talk) 02:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 American Athletic Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One link not enough to navigate. We also don't create individual season navboxes like this... Corkythehornetfan 05:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Summit League men's soccer coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links not enough to navigate... Corkythehornetfan 05:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when at least half of the coach names (preferably all) turn blue —PC-XT+ 07:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Southern Conference men's soccer coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links not enough to navigate... Corkythehornetfan 05:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when at least half of the names (preferably all) turn blue —PC-XT+ 07:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Big West Conference men's soccer coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links not enough to navigate... Corkythehornetfan 05:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when at least half of the coach names (preferably all) turn blue —PC-XT+ 07:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sun Belt Women's Basketball Tournament navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. REFUND applies if and when at least two other years get created. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two links is not enough to navigate... Corkythehornetfan 01:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. D1 women's basketball conference tournaments are notable and these should eventually be filled in at some point. The presence of the navbox is a good illustration of where an interested editor is needed. Jhn31 (talk) 04:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when a couple more years turn blue —PC-XT+ 04:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. We can restore if articles are written, but it's not clear that they will be anytime soon. ~ Rob13Talk 04:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sun Belt Conference football statistical leaders navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 00:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three links is not enough to navigate... Corkythehornetfan 01:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The other FBS conferences all have navboxes, and the plan is to eventually fill in these articles too. Jhn31 (talk) 04:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per UW Dawgs' reasoning. Already at three, with obvious room to grow. Mackensen (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Currently has four links, which is enough to navigate. The red links should be removed as per WP:REDNOT. ~ Rob13Talk 04:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Student Radio Stations of the Sun Belt Conference edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One link... not enough to navigate. Corkythehornetfan 01:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not sure if notable, but it doesn't look like it's "normal" to have navboxes for this subject. Jhn31 (talk) 04:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Student radio stations organized by the conference that their parent university's sports teams happen to be associated with is not a thing we template — and even if it were, a one-item template isn't doing anything navigationally. Bearcat (talk) 16:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links. Bearcat is correct too....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sun Belt Conference men's soccer coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One link... not enough to navigate. Corkythehornetfan 01:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The other D1 conferences have these navboxes, and it looks pretty normal for them not to be complete yet. But eventually they should get there. Jhn31 (talk) 04:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:REDLINK (not broken) with clear WP:GNG subjects. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or userfy for now as premature, with support for restoring when at least half of the names (preferably all) turn blue —PC-XT+ 04:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:EXISTING and WP:NAVBOX. We don't use navboxes for non-existent articles because our guidelines say navboxes are used to (quoting NAVBOX) "facilitate navigation between ... articles". Per WP:REDNOT, excessive red links are not used in navboxes. ~ Rob13Talk 04:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_July_12&oldid=730784194"