Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 4

< January 3	January 5 >

January 4 edit

UEFA Euro U-21 Team of the Tournament edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UEFA Euro U-21 2011 Team of the Tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:UEFA Euro U-21 2013 Team of the Tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:UEFA Euro U-21 2015 Team of the Tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-notable youth awards, a navbox is not required. Giant Snowman 19:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – per nom. Non notable youth award. Qed237 (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per nom. Kante4 (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Can be used in the articles themselves and not a template. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 22:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator's rationale: it's a minor youth award that does not define the recipients as a class. We need to stomp on the proliferation of sports-related navboxes for trivia and other minor topics of marginal notability. Not everything needs a navbox, and youth awards given to entire teams is an easy "delete". Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mohun Bagan A.C. captains edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 17:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mohun Bagan A.C. captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Further to recent consensus, this is FANCRUFT and not a useful guide to navigation. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per past consensus, not needed. Giant Snowman 19:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per nom. Qed237 (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per nom. Kante4 (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per consensus across multiple sports projects: team captains navboxes contribute to bottom-of-the-page cruft, oeverwhelming more meaningful navboxes. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kurds image array edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 17:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kurds image array (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Due to WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES, probably will no longer be of use to any articles. William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 10:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

it is being used on Kurdish population, but given the conclusion of the WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES discussion, it can probably be removed from there as it was removed from Kurds. Frietjes (talk) 13:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Izno (talk) 15:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose this should be deleted per the above discussion —PC-XT+ 09:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).