Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 6

December 6 edit

Template:Culture of Andorra edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was moved to a wider discussion Frietjes (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates the culture section in template:Andorra topics Frietjes (talk) 20:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disagree Added to Culture of Andorra page for consistency with like pages for other countries. Kilometers to Verona (talk) 09:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • so we need a big sidebar for a single article? Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL, this should either be added to all pages it links to, those links should be removed, or it should be deleted. I won't relist this myself since I've expressed an opinion, but I think this should be relisted. If no additional transclusions have been added for 7 days (pinging Kilometers to Verona in case they want to do so), I'd say delete. If this is transcluded on all articles it links to and the total transclusions are four or more, keep. ~ Rob13Talk 06:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, a quick sample of Category:Europe country and territory topics templates, got me five out of five templates of the "<country> articles" kind, all including a culture section and linking to a "Culture of <country>" template. Examples: {{Hungary topics}}, {{Portugal topics}}. I may agree with Frietjes concern with duplication, but it is not at all specific to this Andorra template. - Nabla (talk) 14:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Airbus Group/aircraft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 06:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This template appears to be an outdated duplicate of Template:Airbus Group aircraft, and the only page that links to it is a unused template report. -Sonicwave (talk|c) 19:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; unused Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    14:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Singkawang edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 06:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

None of the articles linked contained any material and all have been redirected to the main article, Singkawang. The navbox serves no navigational function. Cabayi (talk) 11:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, all redirects. Frietjes (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, serves no navigational function and linked articles is just redirect. --Bagas Chrisara (talk) 03:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused tournament bracket templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 06:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion #3 of WP:TFD#REASONS: These templates are not used, and will continue to be unused indefinitely, until Major League Soccer (MLS) or the National Football League (NFL), respectively, ever decide to expand their respective playoff tournaments to include 16 teams. We should not create templates merely "just in case" for WP:CBALL reasons that might never happen for several years. Zzyzx11 (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).