Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 4

December 4

edit

Ununtrium etc. element name templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move and delete the redirects Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. These are temporal, abandoned names for chemical elements. The elements now have definitive names. No use for these any more. Not used in content pages, documentation missing. DePiep (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, withdrawn. Let's and Move & /doc them. (Must say, I've never seen one member of this family being used). -DePiep (talk)
Me neither (and coicidentally today I also learned about {{CO2}} and friends that I've likewise never used). But I also took the opportunity to fix 3 others that weren't properly in the cat. DMacks (talk) 08:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Either this is woefully incomplete or the title is misleading. Only lists 2 animals, out of thousands of parasites. "Hematophagous vertebrates would be a more appropriate title for the included articles, but we do really need a navigation template for that? Plantdrew (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persondata was deprecated by this RfC, which closed on May 26, 2015. Dabao qian (talk) 18:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 11 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. GXXF TC 17:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{copyedit}}. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was history merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template is too narrow. Replace with {{Template:Infobox cycling path}}. Rangasyd (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contains template with one hardcoded parameter. Replace with {{Bristol railway map|collapse=yes}}. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
11:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused copyright tag, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 08:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy del as empty navbox czar 08:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation between a series of articles that are likely to be deleted soon as a WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE violation. ViperSnake151  Talk  06:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused copyright tag, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 03:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused copyright tag, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 03:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge / delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated template without real use. The riders in the 2012 group are there. That information isn't going to change. There is no reason to have a template (even if used on multiple pages) to convey information that is completely static. The Banner talk 00:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep see reasons here, at the other nomination. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 19:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).