Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 18

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 17 August 19 >

August 18 edit

Template:Bakersfield Jam current roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 26#Template:Bakersfield_Jam_current_roster (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This NBA Development League team has moved and been renamed the "Northern Arizona Suns." A template for that teams current roster has been created. Since the franchise no longer exists, there is no Bakersfield Jam "current roster". Rikster2 (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ibookdb author edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 26#Template:Ibookdb_author (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Single use external link template. Target site is dead. No other links to the target site. Includes link to article which has been redirected to a generic page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hugrev edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 26#Template:Hugrev (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undocumented and unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:No documentation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge with Template:Improve documentation (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 23:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:No documentation with Template:Improve documentation.
{{Improve documentation}} already covers "missing" documentation. The other template is an unnecessary fork from it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Terra (talk) 04:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MP small edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 23:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template superseded by {{Infobox planet}}   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  16:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Real Housewives of Melbourne edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to provide useful navigation. Can be dealt with by normal linking in articles. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Template is to provide a smoother navigation, with the project to create individual pages directed to each season more links will be available. No reason to delete it now for it to have to be recreated again down the line upon creation of more links. Deleting it seems pedantic. Kelege (talk) 12:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Pointless as there are no linked articles. The code can always be preserved in a sandbox if there is a genuine intent to create all the episode articles in the near future. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gsvlink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:48, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Goo movie edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Single use external link template. Target site appears defunct, and links redirect to a different site, using a different ID. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Germania Sacra edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External link template with only two transclusions. No other links to the target site. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, please. This template links articles to the internationally important Germania Sacra project which aims to capture and publish online all historical documents relating to the church history of the Holy Roman Empire. There are now over 20 links and I am in the process of adding to them. --Bermicourt (talk) 12:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Happy to Withdraw as this is now being used. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pinoy Big Brother: Celebrity Edition edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate information that can be found in {{Pinoy Big Brother contestants}} and List of Pinoy Big Brother housemates. Not enough links to provide useful navigation. The only links here are to the contestants of the season which is not advised due to a long term consensus. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 11:45, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Real Housewives of New York City edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to provide useful navigation. The only real links in here are cast, which are advised against per longstanding consensus. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:32, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep With links to it's spin-off and the game that is based on the series, as well the project to create pages dedicated to the specific seasons, there is more links then just the cast. Kelege (talk) 12:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Speedy delete under WP:CSD#T3. Template is no longer needed as all information can be found on the primary template for the franchise. Kelege (talk) 14:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • How about we merge all the navboxes to a single {{The Real Housewives}} navbox? It contains a lot of the links already (especially the related shows), so we'd just be adding the season/episode articles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Real Housewives of Miami edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to provide useful navigation. Can be dealt with by normal linking in articles. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Template is to provide a smoother navigation, with the project to create individual pages directed to each season more links will be available. No reason to delete it now for it to have to be recreated again down the line upon creation of more links. Deleting it seems pedantic. Kelege (talk) 12:17, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:49, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Real Housewives of Cheshire edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to provide useful navigation Rob Sinden (talk) 10:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Template is to provide a smoother navigation, with the project to create individual pages directed to each season more links will be available. No reason to delete it now for it to have to be recreated again down the line upon creation of more links. Deleting it seems pedantic. Kelege (talk) 12:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Speedy delete under WP:CSD#T3. Template is no longer needed as all information can be found on the primary template for the franchise. Kelege (talk) 14:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • How about we merge all the navboxes to a single {{The Real Housewives}} navbox? It contains a lot of the links already (especially the related shows), so we'd just be adding the season/episode articles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Rob Sinden That'd be a really huge navbox though. Assuming each series gets it's seasons done in to separate pages- then there's the spin-off series too. The only way to shorten would have one navbox of domestic and one for international and link them to one another in related programming. Even then I worry the domestic navbox would be huge... I get the logic of one big "Real Housewives" navbox, as there is, but for the more specific links I think it would get out of hand- which is why I'm for keeping them as they are, especially with the creation of pages dedicated to the individual seasons. Kelege (talk) 14:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • It really isn't that big: Look!!! --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • Or this one if you want a bit more separation. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • Rob Sinden I like the second one quite a bit. I did flesh it out a bit more and made it a tad easier to read. Here I added the episodes page to the spin-offs as well as removed the word season before every season to make it flow so it goes Season 1 2 3 etc- rather than Season 1 Season 2 Season 3. Kelege (talk) 03:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
          • This does seem a more sensible way to handle this, and it retains the information rather than deleting. If you're happy to proceed with this, then I am... --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
            • Yeah I'm happy with it Rob Sinden, it keeps it all together and makes sense for a total Real Housewives navigation. Also means the "Real Housewives" template can be use on each page pertaining to the franchise. If there's any problems in the future with it, we'll just deal with it then via the talk page for the template. Kelege (talk) 14:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Whitney Port edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only linked articles are tangential. Provides no useful navigation function. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, standard linking works here. Frietjes (talk) 22:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Audrina Patridge edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lauren Conrad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contains a lot of non-articles. Only links are to people, which can be dealt with by normal linking. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GeekNights edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use external link template. Only one link to the target site in article-space. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:48, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anatomyofascene edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SJSD schools edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country Rugby League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_18&oldid=1138533160"