Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 12

< August 11	August 13 >

August 12 edit

Template:JTWC Best Track Analysis edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:JTWC Best Track Analysis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused template, and i don't think it's useful either. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UEFA coach edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bce edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cochrane edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cochrane (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vinyl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 23:35, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vinyl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template serving no purpose. Just copies the intro to the article for phonograph record. The template's author has since been blocked indefinitely. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; unused Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 11:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FootballAt2013MaccabiahGames edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If the articles make a comeback, WP:REFUND may apply. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 23:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FootballAt2013MaccabiahGames (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary, links to only one article. Other articles don't appear likely to be created. IgnorantArmies (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - links to zero articles - I just deleted the last one as an expired PROD - David Gerard (talk) 18:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Viola Beach edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Viola Beach (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only four links; WP:NENAN recommends five. Laun chba ller 14:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough links to provide useful navigation. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Substitute, then Delete. Tragic story, but no additional tracks or albums are likely to be forthcoming. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NENAN. Do not substitute, as that defeats the whole purpose of its deletion. anemone projectors 21:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gallica edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:This Morning edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 23:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:This Morning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We don't have cast and crew in navboxes per longstanding consensus. A navbox just detailing presenters of a TV show is just an extension of the same principle. Navboxes like this just encourage WP:TEMPLATECREEP and put WP:UNDUE weight on certain performances of an entertainer over others. For the same reason we have the guideline WP:PERFCAT for categories. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 17:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per consensus regarding cast and crew in navboxes. anemone projectors 21:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Loose Women edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Loose Women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No cast and crew in navboxes per longtime consensus. Navboxes like this cause WP:TEMPLATECREEP and put WP:UNDUE weight on certain performances over others. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 17:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per consensus regarding cast and crew in navboxes. anemone projectors 21:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).