Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 1

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 31 August 2 >

August 1 edit

Template:ABS-CBN News personalities edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bad idea. We don't create cast navboxes. 98.230.192.179 (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob13Talk 03:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 21:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hungary squad 1997 FIFA World Youth Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More of the same; there's multiple instances of consensus against these youth navboxes. See here for the latest. ~ Rob13Talk 03:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 21:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete the non-championship boxes, no opinion on the 1997 box. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northland's NewsCenter edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arrangement effectively defunct, brand hasn't even been used on-air anymore (loose group of stations that have shared news programming at some point in time) ViperSnake151  Talk  18:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lacrosse coach navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to make navigation worthwhile (two linked coaches or less). ~ Rob13Talk 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Again, Rob doesn't cite a policy nor guideline which backs up his standards for "worthwhile navigation. Also, what if the boxes are deleted and the programs subsequently hire a third lacrosse coach soon afterwards? Tom Danson (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • See WP:EXISTING. While it isn't written into a guideline, there's a plethora of TfD precedent that four links is a minimum for navboxes. If there are more coaches in the future, the navbox can be undeleted. ~ Rob13Talk 05:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • See also WP:NAVBOX which is clear that navboxes are for navigation and to "group articles". ~ Rob13Talk 01:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan 18:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 12:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete or userfy. just make sure that the main team articles have the list of head coaches. Frietjes (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16-17 (band) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 8#Template:16-17_(band) (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 05:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough articles to yet warrant a navbox for this band as navigation amongst those listed in not enhanced further by it. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_1&oldid=1142562495"