Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 26

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 25 September 27 >

September 26 edit

Template:San Jose State Spartans women's basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep. Now passes Navbox, nomination has gone past 7 days. (non-admin closure) Arbor to SJ (talk) 19:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXISTING -- It is unused and the links listed do not have an article. Also fails WP:NAVBOX No. 4: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". Corkythehornetfan 23:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, now that issue about NAVBOX rule 4 has been resolved, as Jamie Craighead now has an article. Arbor to SJ (talk) 01:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep for now. appears to be part of a series. Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy - There's still nothing to navigate. If there is an effort underway to create a series of articles on the coaches, then the template can be added back when sufficient articles actually exist between which to navigate. -- Whpq (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TEMSA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 06:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant template - All models are on the Temsa article, The Safari model now redirects back to the article and the only article using the template is TEMSA, (Had there been other articles using this then I obviously would never have nominated it.). –Davey2010Talk 20:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colorado School of Mines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template Ricky81682 (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment it is now in use, and navigates 5 articles (University, Museum, Orediggers, and two stadiums) -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, now in use. BethNaught (talk) 06:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 06:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Angel (Disambiguation) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 06:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned unused sidebar Ricky81682 (talk) 00:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template was in the process of being improved prior to the time this notification arrived. Twillisjr (talk) 05:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was created in June 2013 and hasn't been edited since November. What process are you talking about? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Update. It hasn't been touched since the original AFD notice. Still see no reason to keep it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment this template makes no sense, it is not disambiguation -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 06:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, not really touched since 2013. Frietjes (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not used . -- Whpq (talk) 13:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not used. Apparently not necessary to keep around then. --Soetermans. T / C 11:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_26&oldid=687638142"