Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 1

September 1

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No prospect of expansion. Alakzi (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A navbox for two articles, appears unnecessary when we can just link the articles to each other Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteAlakzi (talk) 19:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

broken and unused. Frietjes (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Curly Turkey: Frietjes (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteAlakzi (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No need for this, can use Template:Infobox television episode instead. WOSlinker (talk) 11:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteAlakzi (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No need for this, can use Template:Infobox television episode instead. WOSlinker (talk) 11:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I created the template back in June 2015, based on the template from the Minecraft Wiki. Thinking back, I believe that the template does not really serve any purpose, as it's main use (quickly signing unsigned comments immediately after they are added) can just as easily be done by SineBot. In its current state it doesn't even work with IP addresses (linking to the user page instead of contributions), since unlike the Minecraft Wiki's unsigned template, Wikipedia's does not use Lua and does not have auto IP address checking.

I don't believe that the template has been used very often, though I may be wrong (since it is substituted there isn't really a way to check). -Sonicwave (talk|c) 05:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was replace transclusions with {{DDB}} where possible and deleteAlakzi (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rarely used template with errors. End of September 2015 de:BAM-Portal will be shut down. It will be integrated into the de:Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek (DDB).[1] This is a good time to delete this template and make a new start with {{DDB}} (de:Vorlage:DDB).

SPK digital (the link added on 20 July 2015‎) is only one of many German library catalogs. Examples:

--Kolja21 (talk) 22:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Replacement template appears not to have been created yet?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Opabinia regalis (talk) 03:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.