Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 November 9

< November 8	November 10 >

November 9 edit

Template:European Games stadia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist at Nov 17. Primefac (talk) 06:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:European Games stadia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:European Games Host Cities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navboxes with only one entry, far below the five article guideline to warrant one. If this event ever actually happens again then these could be recreated in the future, but as it stands not everything needs a navbox. QueenCake (talk) 23:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nursing topics sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nursing topics sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless collection of redlinks that adds no navigational assistance, merely adds the logo of a Filipino college for no discernible reason. Bazj (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Teacher edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Teacher (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fairly random collection of education links. Was transcluded on just two pages, Teacher & List of Education Articles. Serves no purpose. Bazj (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete, redundant with more targeted navigation boxes. Frietjes (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete what a mess. Why is the Montessori logo for a local Montessori network being used? -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 09:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as noted, serves no purpose. Jim Carter 10:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Big Brother sidebar/Bigg Boss edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Big Brother sidebar/Bigg Boss (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one transclusion, redundant with Template:Bigg Boss §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep, seems no different than all the other ones. Frietjes (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Big Brother and therefore integral in all Wikipedia articles about Big Brother. --WeirdWaffle (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).