Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 June 22

< June 21	June 23 >

June 22 edit

Template:WWE Programming edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WWE Programming (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overkill. The main WWE template has all of this stuff covered in it, and 2 templates regarding the same topic seems redundant to me. Vjmlhds 18:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete I'm pretty sure that the only shows linked in this template that aren't in the main WWE template are redirects to the List of current WWE programming article.LM2000 (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Principle CW-radar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 July 3. Opabinia regalis (talk) 21:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Principle CW-radar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one article, info can be transcluded there The Banner talk 14:58, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete inappropriate use of templates96.52.0.249 (talk) 00:30, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ this is just a clunky way to make an annotated image. They're not intended to be widely used; they just provide searchable, legible text superposed on an image that can be reused in other language wikis. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, it has been merged, so redirect I suppose. It's not so obtrusive in the article that it's worth keeping separate. I reject the general principle that annotated images must have multiple transclusions, but I'm not going to link any counterexamples because WP:BEANS. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:06, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
indifferent, I simplified the code to use {{annotated image}}, and to only use the features which are in use. I don't really have a strong opinion concerning merging it with the article. Frietjes (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The template should be deleted now. Per WP:TMP, it should include "Wiki markup to be included on several pages via transclusion". It is no longer used on any page and is not likely to be used on any other page.96.52.0.249 (talk) 09:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Casual Vacancy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Casual Vacancy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete as unused. Bazj (talk) 11:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 13:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GKDLink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GKDLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

1. The creator of the template says, "There are now no links to it and the German equivalent has been deleted (presumably superseded) so I think we can safely bin this one". See "User talk:Bermicourt#Template:GKDLink"
2. 0 transclusion(s) found. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 02:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 13:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.