Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 30

December 30 edit

Template:Miss Puerto Rico edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

only connects two articles; the rest are redirects or section links. Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as it connects an organization to one thing it does. Not helpful. Legacypac (talk) 17:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since redirects are not useful in navboxes. Section links might be if they were sections in different articles but does not seem to be the case. Uzume (talk) 19:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not a useful navigation aid: deceptively redirects all linked topics to one of only two related articles. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tactics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox for non-notable band. Band article deletion discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactics (metal band) | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Emmerdale family navigational templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NENAN. These are redundant to Template:Emmerdale characters. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tending to keep. Rather the other Navbox, which presents a huge but incomplete selection of characters, should be deleted. PanchoS (talk) 07:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, the combined navbox works fine, and doesn't try to provide extraneous non-navigational information. Frietjes (talk) 17:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The numerous character articles probably need to be merged. Also agree with Frietjes. --Izno (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 07:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ciudad Victoria TV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 8Primefac (talk) 00:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shooting Stars edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 8Primefac (talk) 00:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Earth titleholders 2001 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 8Primefac (talk) 00:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).