Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 6

August 6 edit

Template:Hilary Duff songs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was mergeOpabinia regalis (talk) 06:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Hilary Duff songs with Template:Hilary Duff.
No need for two navboxes. Singles/songs can easily be incorporated in the main template. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, they were until very recently. [1][2] --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Earwig talk 20:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fireboats of Puget Sound edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteOpabinia regalis (talk) 06:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple issues.

  • Uses a military template for non-military items
  • Only 4 items in the category, no need for a navigation box.
  • Characterizes as fireboats of Seattle then as Fireboats of Puget Sound
  • Categorized United States military ship templates, which it isn't

--Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as per Torritorri Keep ... Item 1 is irrelevant as Civil Air Patrol and other civilian, non-military agencies use military templates ... Item 2 there are 9 items in the category, not 4, and additional ones are being added ... Item 3 isn't a criteria for deletion ... Item 4, though not a criteria for deletion, is fixed (cat deleted - not sure how it ended up there) LavaBaron (talk) 04:31, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.