Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 April 10

< April 9	April 11 >

April 10

Template:Unsigned-unk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 April 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Presidents of Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Presidents of Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two of the names have their own articles. Rahat (Message) 16:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is about collaborative creation, not undue deletion. I suggest Ctg4Rahat to help in relevant article creation, rather than singling out specific articles for deletion. Islami Chhatra shibir is one of the large student organizations in Bangladesh, and I believe that a list of its Presidents should not be deleted simply on the logic that only two of the names have their "own articles". The logic presented is absurd, if not laced with vested interest. ~Mohammad Hossain~ 17:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You should create a list then, not a navbox. Such a list could be presented at Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir until such time as it is necessary to split that content out due to WP:WEIGHT or WP:SIZE. --Izno (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no prejudice against recreation at a later date when more articles are present. Navboxes are for navigation within Wikipedia, not lists of not-notable persons. --Izno (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnecessary --Aftabuzzaman (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete First we create articles, then navigation boxes. Not the other way around. Dimadick (talk) 19:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Team form templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per author approval. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb cf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb cf t (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Football club form (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Recent created fb templates all editors that responded there thought it should be eliminated as it is not needed/usefull. QED237 (talk) 16:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 16:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - simply not needed. Giant Snowman 16:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnecessary. --Jaellee (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per WP:FOOTY discussion rationale. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Not needed. CRwikiCA talk 18:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK then, delete them, but pls do it asap. ^Ol^Ja 18:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WoD mage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WoD mage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

mostly redirects or section links, and otherwise duplicates template:WoD. Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Izno (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Palomar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Palomar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Contained just 2 pages, a band and their one album. Band article has been merged to another. Album article may also be deleted, but the template can go irrespective of that. – Fayenatic London 08:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MechWarrior series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MechWarrior series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BattleTech Universe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:MechWarrior series with Template:BattleTech Universe.
At this time carrying basically the same information, and I don't think it's sensible to strip out the BattleTech template to just the non-MechWarrior games. Izno (talk) 04:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. It doesn't seem as though these two subjects are distinct enough from each other to be on two separate lists. Steel1943 (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.