Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 September 3

< September 2	September 4 >

September 3 edit

Template:2013 Mid-American Conference men's soccer navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2013 Mid-American Conference men's soccer navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template has only 2 non-redlinks on it. Doubtful that any of the redlinked articles will be created. The redlinks are barely notable and a new soccer season has started which decreases the chance any of these will be made. X96lee15 (talk) 21:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as premature/useless navbox —PC -XT + 03:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:'''James Sargeant''' edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:'''James Sargeant''' (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. NSH002 (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete as single-use template —PC -XT + 03:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:"Howlin' Mad" vs. The Army by Harry A. Gailey. Dell Publishing August 1987. Chapter 10. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:"Howlin' Mad" vs. The Army by Harry A. Gailey. Dell Publishing August 1987. Chapter 10. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, and content not suitable for a template. NSH002 (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as this is not a template, but more like a test edit (G2) or T3 candidate —PC -XT + 03:16, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Meghwal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Meghwal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Someone keeps reinstating material in this new template, which is supposed to cover the Meghwal caste of India that is so frequently subject to POV contributions from community members. The template is full of violations of WP:V and WP:BLP, contains non-notable literature that will never have valid articles and has contained links to highly tangential political parties etc whose only real connection to the group is that they campaign on behalf of the Scheduled Castes, who comprise hundreds of different communities. I've no idea what the criteria is for templates but this one seems just useless. Sitush (talk) 11:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for having too few relevant links. The only link some of the politicians have is last name, as far as the articles say. Others' articles don't mention Meghwal other than that this template is transcluded. —PC -XT + 17:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.