Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 30

< July 29	July 31 >

July 30

Template:Creep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Creep (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Articles only for one album and one member of the group make navigation between articles simple without need of this navbox. WP:NENAN. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 20:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete; excellent example of template creep! ;) --Zfish118 (talk) 02:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the ironicly named template —PC -XT + 04:50, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cold War figures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cold War figures (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a navobox overkill. It could be replaced by category. But as it was remarked in the first TD "Inclusion in this template is arbitrary, therefore POV". The template expanded in the last 6 years to include more and more people. This is the result of not having a specific criterion of what to include and what not. I suggest deletion. Normal categorisation serves its purpose in a better way. Magioladitis (talk) 14:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 20:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to having no inclusion criteria —PC -XT + 04:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Made Men Music Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Made Men Music Group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template's parent article is not notable. Also, there is only one notable artist among the bunch. Versace1608 (Talk) 13:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 20:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Maghreb Arab literature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maghreb Arab literature (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that contains just one link. DexDor (talk) 05:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom, better served by a category, if at all. Frietjes (talk) 20:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused, premature navbox —PC -XT + 05:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Manila commercial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Manila commercial (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links covered in the main Template:Metro Manila populated places.--RioHondo (talk) 04:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant —PC -XT + 05:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox standard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:28, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox standard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox song (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox standard with Template:Infobox song.
Similar to the point of redundancy. –Chase (talk / contribs) 00:30, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support "standard" makes little sense here as an infobox name since standard would be expected to be a flag infobox or a technical standard infobox. (ie. standard weights and measures, standard money, standard parts, etc) -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 04:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per 65.94 and it will be easier to understand. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all of the above —PC -XT + 05:20, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support – It probably started out with good intentions, but has become yet another place for exhausting lists of "covers" (recorded by and performed by fields). Plus it is doesn't have fields for first release info (recorded, released, length, label, producer, etc) that is very useful for songs. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:48, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Agree with all of above. Bonnie (talk) 18:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.