Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 January 29

January 29

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete (deleted by John ReavesPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cyberpunk/Image (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/Layout (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cyberpunk/Image/9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete As the template creator, I can explain that this was created to accompany the Cyberpunk footer template. As a literary movement, it was desirable to use an image of an author, but no single author was desired over another. So this template randomized them. It has fallen into disuse, and I don't care to defend it. I'd even forgotten it until this moment. --Cast (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.