Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 16

< December 15	December 17 >

December 16 edit

Template:Cropped image edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cropped image (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary frontend for Template:CSS image crop. Frietjes (talk) 23:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, identical in function and only 3 remaining transclusions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WOFall (talk • contribs) 00:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TCACycle WP78 cropped edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TCACycle WP78 cropped (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and broken. Frietjes (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Broken, unused and http://www.wikipathways.org/index.php/Pathway:WP78 has fixed template. --Mrjulesd (talk) 12:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WBCBL Teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as failing to provide it's primary purpose: a navigational aide Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WBCBL Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The navigational template contains one blue link, Women's Blue Chip Basketball League, which is the only article the template is located in. The template simply creates a list of the basketball teams in the league, thus going against WP:TG, and could better be expressed in a list or table in the league's article. Aspects (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Navboxes exist to navigate among linked articles. We often debate whether some red links are acceptable -- in this case they are NO blue links for presently existing articles. This navbox serves no purpose that a list of teams withing the articles would no serve better. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Would keeping the navbox encourage others to add team articles? TheScottDL (talk) 22:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. First write articles, then create template. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Years in the State of Palestine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as redundant Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in the State of Palestine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

all redirects. Frietjes (talk) 20:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - refers to the post-2012 entity, formerly referred as "Palestinian Authority". State of Palestine is the UN designation, regardless whether it is recognized and by how many nations and it does function as a semi-state.GreyShark (dibra) 16:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- then why is it entirely redirects? Frietjes (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Because someone moved all relevant Year in the State of Palestine articles to Year in the Palestinian territories, with no discussion.GreyShark (dibra) 12:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete - redundant to Template:Years in the Palestinian territories. If necessary, that template can be changed to split its contents between the two designations, following appropriate discussion. --NSH002 (talk) 19:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It just duplicates Template:Years in the Palestinian territories. Jackninja5 (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete as redundant to Template:Years in the Palestinian territories. Adding the official designation in this templates header would be sufficient. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Years in the Republic of India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as duplicate Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in the Republic of India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

duplicates Template:Years in India. Frietjes (talk) 19:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 13:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Years in India is enough. Jackninja5 (talk) 06:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as pure duplication. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Years in Bosnia and Herzegovina edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep as sufficiently likely to develop in to useful navigational aides Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in Bosnia and Herzegovina (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in North Korea (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in Sierra Leone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 19:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 13:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even with only two years active, others can be added and the articles that currently exist can be found easily.Wzrd1 (talk) 20:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Wzrd1. Jackninja5 (talk) 06:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. --BiH (talk) 07:27, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep any that develop sufficient working links —PC-XT+ 22:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Years in Iceland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep as sufficiently likely to develop in to useful navigational aides Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in Iceland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in Jordan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in Kuwait (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in Lebanon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in Libya (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in North Vietnam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in Rwanda (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in Saudi Arabia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in the United Arab Emirates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 19:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 13:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Requires some days of work. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The links could work soon with just enough work. Jackninja5 (talk) 05:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep any that develop sufficient working links, with the option to userfy any that someone plans to fix if it is taking a while —PC-XT+ 22:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep any that develop sufficient working links, with the option to userfy any that someone plans to fix if it is taking a while. -PC has an excellent approach to the situation.--DThomsen8 (talk) 22:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Years in the Moon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 21:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in the Moon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Years in Venus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think we would actually get much on events that happen there. This isn't Futurama. Jackninja5 (talk) 05:58, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only 1 link!!! Poster boy for WP:NENAN. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Azerbaijan Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all per precedent. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Azerbaijan Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Croatia Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Czech Republic Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Italy Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Portugal Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Romania Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Russia Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Serbia Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Slovenia Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Turkey Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Slovenia Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ukraine Squad 2012 UEFA Futsal Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-championship squad and duplicates UEFA Futsal Euro 2012 squads. Frietjes (talk) 16:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All - The precedent is well established among the sports WikiProjects that we do not encourage navboxes for non-championship, non-medalist teams -- and we discrouage them for minor tournament championships. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rugby tier 3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as uncontested Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rugby tier 3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template and per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_union#Tiers defunct Gnevin (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Gnevin (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rugby tier 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as uncontested Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rugby tier 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template and per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_union#Tiers defunct Gnevin (talk) 15:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Gnevin (talk) 15:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rugby tier 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as uncontested Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rugby tier 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template and per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_union#Tiers defunct Gnevin (talk) 15:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Gnevin (talk) 15:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hoak Media edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hoak Media (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

After the sale of KNHL (formerly KHAS-TV) was done, Hoak now only owns KAUZ (and sale of KAUZ is pending), made this template unnecessary. John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 13:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Csworldwide1 (talk) 05:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William 22:16, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Flashlink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Flashlink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It has only 19 use cases and its use is unnecessary as per WP:EL#Rich media. Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 09:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conceptually, i want to agree, but is the need for the template truly gone? WP:EL#Rich media seems to point toward specifying when an external link requires a proprietary plug-in. Ideally, as some subjective percentage of modern browser adoption meant most were able to view such content without plug-ins, the template would no longer be warranted. Would deletion just roll any uses back to the basic external link template? Cander0000 (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 06:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The correct style seems to be (Adobe Flash Player) rather than Requires Adobe Flash Player, and it's just as easy to write that as it is to write the template name. And the direct method can work for any plugin, not just those that have a template. I'd reconsider if we wanted to put in an icon or something, but it's easy to re-recreate the template if need be. -- Beland (talk) 22:27, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.